Re: Two silly questions

From: William McCall <william.mccall_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:01:36 -0500

Cool responses. For the NSSA no-summary, is there *any* other way than
a totally NSSA to do this? I got told something I found kind of
ridiculous. (something about creating an NSSA with some unheard of
option of allow default only or similar)

As for the extranet, I'm guessing that an enterprise performing
route-leaking between VRFs would still qualify as the same technology
but maybe a different term than "extranet"?

In any case, the question is more or less answered, but I had to pick
the brains of the masters.

William McCall
CCIE #25044 (R&S)

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:51 PM, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote:
> 1) area x nssa no-summary on all the ABR's.
>
> 2) This one is kind of vague. An extranet is any network that connects more
> than one company but does not use the "internet". You can have an extranet
> in a single vpn or using a series of overlaps. Let me know if I'm missing
> something.
>
>
>
> Two silly questions
> William McCall to: Cisco certification
> 08/25/09 08:10 PM
> Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Please respond to William McCall
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> I received two questions today (no, not on the exam, so quit crying NDA)
>
> 1) In an NSSA, what methods can you use to limit the routes to 7's and
> a default route
> 2) Is route leaking in MPLS effectively the same as providing "extranet"?
>
> I already have some answers I gave.. and I believe them to be right,
> but I was corrected.
>
> Give me your best, experts!
>
> William McCall
> CCIE #25044 (R&S)
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at
> http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 26 2009 - 00:01:36 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART