Re: Why a transit area cannot be a stub area?

Hmm...

I define area a transit Area as "The Transit area" aka Area 0.

Now since Area 0 is connected to every other area it seems contracdictory to
me and my viewpoint to ever declare it a stub area.

Each area attached to Area 0 sends its information to Area 0.

Virtual-links are an extension of Area 0.

So with all that said... what was the question again?

I have a pretty nice powerpoint that kinda illustrates the whole picture and
I guess if you stare at it long enough it starts to make sense. :)

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Hoogen <hoogen82_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I have been trying to look around but any more information would be
> great...
>
> The only thing I understand it can't be done is because RFC says so.. and
> because just in case the disconnected area has ASBR type 5 external lsa's
> cannot pass through.
>
> Anyone has any more information other than this?
>
> -Hoogen
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 24 2009 - 19:13:07 ART