Re: Natting multicast problem...

From: Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:00:57 -0400

Great point there! The only thing I'd add is to be aware, if you try
to tell the proctor you have a bug... They have seen probably EVERY
version of misconfiguration there is. And they may likely know exactly
what you did (or didn't do) by your describing the "bug". Don't take it
the wrong way when they tell you it's not a bug and send you back to
your desk...

It's nothing personal!

 

*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

evil_at_ine.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

 

Rick Mur wrote:
> I never ran into a bug on both my labs, all things I thought it was a
> bug was just me thinking the wrong way :-)
>
> It will not change the point of the conversation. The labs are
> developed and tested on the same platform and the same version as
> you'll get on your attempt. Therefore minimizing the possibility of
> running into a bug.
>
> And please be cautious when calling it a bug, since most times it's a
> misconfiguration, misassumption or just a clear or reload would fix
> it. I've helped dozens of customers who claimed to have found a bug
> which turned out to be something else.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 20 2009 - 13:00:57 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART