RE: Sob Story

dont forget to mention the customer looking behind your back or via
Meetingplace where everyone can see what are you typing, or if hesitate about
entering a command or mistyping and if you at the end disable or not the debug
commands.

now thats worst.

JoJo

> From: Andre.Dufour_at_PAETEC.com
> To: shaibal_mitra_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:41:36 -0400
> Subject: RE: Sob Story
>
> My thoughts are and have always been that...we are expected to troubleshoot,
implement and design networks when there are plenty of distractions (music,
vendors, stress, family, weather)....so...why not be expected to do the same
with a lab that is expected to prove our knowledge which is to be applied in
our work?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Shaibal Mitra
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:10 PM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Sob Story
>
> Thought I should share my sob story with fellow sufferers.I passed the CCIE
written in Mar 2007 and then took my first Lab attempt at Sao Paulo.All
through the first attempt the proctor kept on talking over the telephone and I
was not able to focus.Cisco charges an obscene amount for the Lab isnt it
logical they should provide a Test environment which is quiet and necessary
for a 8 hour battle.Perhaps we should file a PIL so that the company wakes up
and realises they are not fulfilling their obligations by not providing the
required Lab environment.My experience in my subsequent two attempts were
hardly any different.Ideally there should be sound-proofed cubicles for each
test-taker and take my word for it ear-plugs and ear-muffs DO NOT work.What I
found from my subsequent desperate research is even if you use ear-plugs/muffs
speech gets conducted through the head bones and of course they will not allow
you to play music to drown out the speech.
>
> Also when I took the written test there was no rule stating that one had to
take the Lab at least once a year or the written exam would become
invalid.Again perhaps a PIL...
>
> Very frankly if the correct exam environment is provided and the company
didnt keep on playing with the exam format/contents etc. there would be many
more CCIEs.Which is obviously why they resort to these nasty methods.What is
the logic of introducing MPLS VPNs when the topic is already covered in the
Service Provider track?
>
> PIL anyone...?
>
> Just in case my language is as convoluted as that of Cisco by PIL I mean
Public Interest Litigation.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Log on to MSN India for a lowdown on whats hot in the world today
http://in.msn.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 18 2009 - 11:52:51 ART