Re: CPU Process Question

From: jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:22:58 +0530

Hi,

You can also try

monitor process cpu. <<<< but I'm not sure will it work or not when process
is reached 100%

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Tony Varriale
<tvarriale_at_flamboyaninc.com>wrote:

> I'm really disappointed not seeing the "s" in there after the cpu! :)
>
> tv
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Marko Milivojevic
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:02 PM
> To: Scott Morris
> Cc: Ryan West; Nauman Habib; Steve Lyons; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: CPU Process Question
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 19:50, Scott Morris<swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
> > Keep in mind the "." is an expression for any character...
> >
> > e 0\.00 will specifically match the period.
> One of the things I always put on any production router I run is:
>
> alias exec ps show proc cpu | e 0.00%__0.00%__0.00%
>
> It's useful to show only those processes that actually use any CPU at
> that moment. No need to worry about the dot in this case :-).
>
> --
> Marko
> CCIE #18427 (SP)
> My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 13 2009 - 18:22:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:56 ART