Re: LDP/TDP

I am also thinking, how ldp/tdp up between ldp and tdp routers?
could you give show mpls ldp neighbor outputs on both routers?

Thanks,
Srinivas

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Shaughn Smith <
Shaughn.Smith_at_mtnbusiness.co.za> wrote:

> If you have LDP on the PE router, and have specified TDP on the CE then I
> dont think the MPLS LDP/TDP relationship is up.
>
> They both need to be the same, or you can run mpls label protocol both.
>
> But if the relationship is up then the command mpls ldp neighbor xxxx
> password will work
>
>
>
> *From:* Splinter [mailto:splinter330_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:03 PM
> *To:* Shaughn Smith
> *Cc:* srinivas pv; Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: LDP/TDP
>
>
>
> Sorry I did not give enough info...
>
> 7200 PE router is running LDP and on the interface connected to the CE 2600
> TDP router i have
> "mpls label protocol tdp"
>
> my mpls LDP/TDP neighbor is up now i need to runn authentication between
> these 2 routers. can thise be done? or do i now need to reconfigure my PE
> router to run TDP.
>
> Splinter
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Shaughn Smith <
> Shaughn.Smith_at_mtnbusiness.co.za> wrote:
>
> Mpls LDP neighbor covers both LDP/TDP
>
>
>
> *From:* srinivas pv [mailto:vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:49 PM
> *To:* Shaughn Smith
> *Cc:* Splinter; Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: LDP/TDP
>
>
>
> Hi Shaughn,
>
> In that case, TDP runs on both.
> Then I don't think 'mpls ldp nei x.x.x.x password' is applicable to TDP? It
> is only for LDP. Isn't it?
>
> I guess if want to go for authentication, you need to use LDP.
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Shaughn Smith <
> Shaughn.Smith_at_mtnbusiness.co.za> wrote:
>
> Ah, sorry. Didn't read the e-mail correctly
>
> If you are trying to run TDP and LDP it wont work unless you have the
> keyword "both" enabled on the interfaces.
>
> If you have done that then my previous e-mail is correct, you can run mpls
> ldp neighbor xxxx password
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> srinivas pv
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:14 PM
> To: Splinter
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: LDP/TDP
>
> Hi,
>
> I think, you need to use same label distribution protocol between
> neighbors.
> Isn't it?
> I am not sure, how you can run TDP and LDP between neighbors.
>
> You may configure 'mpls label protocol both', but it just supports both
> protocols.
>
> But you can not run LDP and TDP between neighbors.
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Splinter <splinter330_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > i am using a 2600 for my CE router and it is running TDP connected to my
> PE
> > LDP router and
> > I would like to do LDP/TDP authentication between these routers.
> >
> > I am not finding anything related to TDP security or LDP to TDP
> > authentication.
> >
> > Please can you help
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Splinter
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTE: This e-mail message and all attachments thereto contain
> confidential information intended for a specific addressee and purpose. If
> you are not the addressee (a) you may not disclose, copy, distribute or
take
> any action based on the contents hereof; (b) kindly inform the sender
> immediately and destroy all copies hereof. Any copying, publication or
> disclosure of this message, or part hereof, in any form whatsoever, without
> the sender's express written consent, is prohibited. No opinion expressed
or
> implied by the sender necessarily constitutes the opinion of MTN. This
> message does not constitute a guarantee or proof of the facts mentioned
> herein. No Employee or intermediary is authorised to conclude a binding
> agreement on behalf of MTN Group Limited, or any of its subsidiary
> companies, by e-mail without the express written confirmation by a duly
> authorised representative of MTN Group Limited.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> NOTE: This e-mail message and all attachments thereto contain confidential
> information intended for a specific addressee and purpose. If you are not
> the addressee (a) you may not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action
> based on the contents hereof; (b) kindly inform the sender immediately and
> destroy all copies hereof. Any copying, publication or disclosure of this
> message, or part hereof, in any form whatsoever, without the sender's
> express written consent, is prohibited. No opinion expressed or implied by
> the sender necessarily constitutes the opinion of MTN. This message does
not
> constitute a guarantee or proof of the facts mentioned herein. No Employee
> or intermediary is authorised to conclude a binding agreement on behalf of
> MTN Group Limited, or any of its subsidiary companies, by e-mail without
the
> express written confirmation by a duly authorised representative of MTN
> Group Limited.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> NOTE: This e-mail message and all attachments thereto contain confidential
> information intended for a specific addressee and purpose. If you are not
> the addressee (a) you may not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action
> based on the contents hereof; (b) kindly inform the sender immediately and
> destroy all copies hereof. Any copying, publication or disclosure of this
> message, or part hereof, in any form whatsoever, without the sender's
> express written consent, is prohibited. No opinion expressed or implied by
> the sender necessarily constitutes the opinion of MTN. This message does
not
> constitute a guarantee or proof of the facts mentioned herein. No Employee
> or intermediary is authorised to conclude a binding agreement on behalf of
> MTN Group Limited, or any of its subsidiary companies, by e-mail without
the
> express written confirmation by a duly authorised representative of MTN
> Group Limited.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 12 2009 - 18:37:50 ART