Re: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype Review -

FBI.... took over..... LOL

________________________________
From: Ryan
West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
To: Dark Fiber <darkfiber08_at_gmail.com>; Petr Lapukhov
<petr_at_internetworkexpert.com>
Cc: "ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com"
<ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>; "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, 10 August, 2009 3:54:07 AM
Subject: RE: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype
Review -

http://darbylogs.blogspot.com/

http://m.twitter.com/darby_weaver
He may have _known_ too much and Cisco was afraid someone was going to start
figuring out how to decipher his posts, so he's been assassinated,
virtually...

-ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Dark Fiber
Sent: Sunday, August
09, 2009 6:14 PM
To: Petr Lapukhov
Cc: ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com;
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype Review -

Anyone
know what happened to the blog?

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Petr Lapukhov
<petr_at_internetworkexpert.com>wrote:

> Hey Darby,
>
> not sure why, but
blogger.com says this blog does not longer exist
> (10:40 PDT). I was able to
read your post yesterday, though. Did you
> leak some secrets there? :) I was
particularly interested in that
> "virtual switch" as it seems to be something
different from the
> well-known "Nexus 1000V". One thing that always bugs me
about switch
> "virtualization" is that they are so much hardware dependency
so it's
> almost impossible to simulate a "realistic" virtual switch without
>
ever emulating the hardware (e.g. PFCs, line card ASICs etc). Actually
> this
why we're getting all that pain dealing with different QoS
> models/features
in different platforms :) Using a "generic virtual
> switch" such as 1000V is
fine with virtual environment, but I was
> really intrigued to see Cisco
trying to do the same with "enterprise"
> switching.
>
> Anyways thanks for an
interesting post,
>
> --
> Petr Lapukhov, petr_at_INE.com
> CCIE #16379
(R&S/Security/SP/Voice)
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.INE.com
>
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> 2009/8/8 ccievoice1
<ccievoice1_at_gmail.com>:
> > If this is really going to happen, i suppose this
apply to R/S and SP
> > tracks. Am really how wondering how Cisco going to
make this happened to
> > other tracks like Voice/Storage/Wireless.
> > Hope
Cisco is going to make the CCIE program better and more reputable :)
> >
> >
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Caue Wailemann <cwailemann_at_gmail.com
>
>wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Scott, how are you man?!
> >> First of all, congrats
for the awesome job in IPExpert BLS, and for
> your
> >> recent work at INE!
You4re the man!!!!
> >>
> >> I do agree with you that it4s just a
speculation, and that the test
> >> center location may change from what it is
nowadays, but, you must agree
> >> with me that there are not 300 centers
worldwide... Most of them are
> inside
> >> USA...
> >>
> >> According to
this list (I don4t even now if it4s right, oficial or
> not)
> >> there are 17
locations outside US, and all the others are in US... Oh by
> >> the
> >> way,
that4s the list I4m talking about:
> >>
> >>
https://www.ncsbn.org/PPC_International_Domestic_8_06.pdf
> >>
> >>
<https://www.ncsbn.org/PPC_International_Domestic_8_06.pdf> So if
> that
>
>> happens, and Cisco turn the switch to Pearson Professional Centers it4s
> a
> >> great thing for anyone in US, but not that good for the ones living
> >>
outside... at least with only those locations.
> >>
> >> That4s just my two
cents! :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Caue Wailemann
> >> MSN: cauew6_at_hotmail.com
> >>
Skype ID: cauefw
> >> ---
> >> Visit my Blog: http://cauew.blogspot.com
> >>

---
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >>