Re: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype Review -

Why would they take actions against them ? I can think of the rack rentals
companies to hate them but Cisco would take action....

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pearson" <nightwar_at_gmail.com>
To: "Martin Hogan" <martin.john.hogan_at_gmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype Review -

> Guys,
>
> Just slightly off-topic to this subject till date Cisco has not commented
> on
> the Dynamips Emulator for Cisco IOS officially and they have also not
> taken
> any action against its developer team. This is what I know of and please
> do
> correct me if I am wrong. What could be the reason for Cisco's silence on
> an
> application that emulates its hardware platform ?
>
> First time I came to know about Dynamips I was searching for download at
> Cisco's website and couldn't find anything about it and later got details
> from other forums.
>
> Pearson.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Martin Hogan
> <martin.john.hogan_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Does this make it MORE or LESS likely the story about pseudo ninja
>> virtual
>> switches being accurate?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The Cisco Yakuza (sp?)???? Little stealthy Router Ninjas...
>> >
>> > ;)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
>> > #4713,
>> >
>> > JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>> >
>> > JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>> >
>> > evil_at_ine.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>> >
>> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>> > <
>> http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>> >
>> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>> >
>> > Outside US: 775-826-4344
>> >
>> >
>> > Knowledge is power.
>> >
>> > Power corrupts.
>> >
>> > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ryan West wrote:
>> > > http://darbylogs.blogspot.com/
>> > >
>> > > http://m.twitter.com/darby_weaver
>> > >
>> > > He may have _known_ too much and Cisco was afraid someone was going
>> > > to
>> > start figuring out how to decipher his posts, so he's been
>> > assassinated,
>> > virtually...
>> > >
>> > > -ryan
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of
>> > Dark Fiber
>> > > Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 6:14 PM
>> > > To: Petr Lapukhov
>> > > Cc: ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> > > Subject: Re: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype Review -
>> > >
>> > > Anyone know what happened to the blog?
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Petr Lapukhov
>> > > <petr_at_internetworkexpert.com>wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> Hey Darby,
>> > >>
>> > >> not sure why, but blogger.com says this blog does not longer exist
>> > >> (10:40 PDT). I was able to read your post yesterday, though. Did you
>> > >> leak some secrets there? :) I was particularly interested in that
>> > >> "virtual switch" as it seems to be something different from the
>> > >> well-known "Nexus 1000V". One thing that always bugs me about switch
>> > >> "virtualization" is that they are so much hardware dependency so
>> > >> it's
>> > >> almost impossible to simulate a "realistic" virtual switch without
>> > >> ever emulating the hardware (e.g. PFCs, line card ASICs etc).
>> > >> Actually
>> > >> this why we're getting all that pain dealing with different QoS
>> > >> models/features in different platforms :) Using a "generic virtual
>> > >> switch" such as 1000V is fine with virtual environment, but I was
>> > >> really intrigued to see Cisco trying to do the same with
>> > >> "enterprise"
>> > >> switching.
>> > >>
>> > >> Anyways thanks for an interesting post,
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Petr Lapukhov, petr_at_INE.com
>> > >> CCIE #16379 (R&S/Security/SP/Voice)
>> > >>
>> > >> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>> > >> http://www.INE.com <http://www.ine.com/> <http://www.ine.com/>
>> > >> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>> > >> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> 2009/8/8 ccievoice1 <ccievoice1_at_gmail.com>:
>> > >>
>> > >>> If this is really going to happen, i suppose this apply to R/S and
>> > >>> SP
>> > >>> tracks. Am really how wondering how Cisco going to make this
>> > >>> happened
>> > to
>> > >>> other tracks like Voice/Storage/Wireless.
>> > >>> Hope Cisco is going to make the CCIE program better and more
>> reputable
>> > :)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Caue Wailemann <
>> cwailemann_at_gmail.com
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Hey Scott, how are you man?!
>> > >>>> First of all, congrats for the awesome job in IPExpert BLS, and
>> for
>> > >>>>
>> > >> your
>> > >>
>> > >>>> recent work at INE! You4re the man!!!!
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I do agree with you that it4s just a speculation, and that the
>> test
>> > >>>> center location may change from what it is nowadays, but, you must
>> > agree
>> > >>>> with me that there are not 300 centers worldwide... Most of them
>> > >>>> are
>> > >>>>
>> > >> inside
>> > >>
>> > >>>> USA...
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> According to this list (I don4t even now if it4s right, oficial
>> > >>>> or
>> > >>>>
>> > >> not)
>> > >>
>> > >>>> there are 17 locations outside US, and all the others are in US...
>> Oh
>> > by
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> way, that4s the list I4m talking about:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> https://www.ncsbn.org/PPC_International_Domestic_8_06.pdf
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> <https://www.ncsbn.org/PPC_International_Domestic_8_06.pdf> So
>> > >>>> if
>> > >>>>
>> > >> that
>> > >>
>> > >>>> happens, and Cisco turn the switch to Pearson Professional Centers
>> > it4s
>> > >>>>
>> > >> a
>> > >>
>> > >>>> great thing for anyone in US, but not that good for the ones
>> > >>>> living
>> > >>>> outside... at least with only those locations.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> That4s just my two cents! :)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> Caue Wailemann
>> > >>>> MSN: cauew6_at_hotmail.com
>> > >>>> Skype ID: cauefw
>> > >>>> ---
>> > >>>> Visit my Blog: http://cauew.blogspot.com
>> > >>>> ---
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> > >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >>>>
>> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >>>
>> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 10 2009 - 09:42:11 ART