Darby,
Please paste your config whenever you find it, It would be very usefull for
many.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> See priorty was the first thing I thought of until I re-read yuor
> requirements. No explicit need for a police command as it were.
>
> Let me check some of my labs - I recall a scenario where I used the police
> command and not the bandwidth command with a nested policy.
>
> Hmm...
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > ya that was typo but still the same. i tried to use the priority command
> > instead of bandwidth but i got stuck with another error "Priority is not
> > allowed in logical class"...
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Good catch! Gotta love Posix.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Larry Hadrava <larryh_at_ipexpert.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Did you try using CHILD versus child?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Larry Hadrava
> >>> CCIE #12203 CCNP
> >>> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
> >>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
> http://www.ipexpert.com/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Ali El Moussaoui
> >>> <mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > when i applied the below i got the following:
> >>> >
> >>> > QoS: Invalid class policy child
> >>> > QoS: Invalid child policy child
> >>> >
> >>> > Note that am applying this policy on the ES ports of 3750
> >>> >
> >>> > Any idea what does this error mean?
> >>> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Ali El Moussaoui <
> >>> mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com
> >>> > >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Does this work?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > class-map match-any VLAN15OR16
> >>> > > match vlan 15
> >>> > > match vlan 16
> >>> > > class-map match-any VLAN16
> >>> > > match vlan 16
> >>> > >
> >>> > > policy-map CHILD
> >>> > > class VLAN16
> >>> > > bandwidth 4000
> >>> > >
> >>> > > policy-map PARENT
> >>> > > class VLAN15OR16
> >>> > > shape average 4000000
> >>> > > service-policy child
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Note that if VLAN16 wants all the traffic then its allowed to make
> >>> VLAN15
> >>> > > starve for bandwidth.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> > > From: Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com>
> >>> > > Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:08 PM
> >>> > > Subject: VLAN Shaping
> >>> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Hello Guys,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I want to shape 2 vlans(10 and 20) to 4Mb and give one of them
> >>> priority
> >>> > > over the other one. Any idea how to do this in a hirarchical MQC?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>> >
> >>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Larry Hadrava
> >>> CCIE #12203 CCNP
> >>> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
> >>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
> http://www.ipexpert.com/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 05 2009 - 10:36:52 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:56 ART