Did you try using CHILD versus child?
-- Thanks Larry Hadrava CCIE #12203 CCNP Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com>wrote: > when i applied the below i got the following: > > QoS: Invalid class policy child > QoS: Invalid child policy child > > Note that am applying this policy on the ES ports of 3750 > > Any idea what does this error mean? > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Does this work? > > > > class-map match-any VLAN15OR16 > > match vlan 15 > > match vlan 16 > > class-map match-any VLAN16 > > match vlan 16 > > > > policy-map CHILD > > class VLAN16 > > bandwidth 4000 > > > > policy-map PARENT > > class VLAN15OR16 > > shape average 4000000 > > service-policy child > > > > Note that if VLAN16 wants all the traffic then its allowed to make VLAN15 > > starve for bandwidth. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali_at_gmail.com> > > Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:08 PM > > Subject: VLAN Shaping > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com > > > > > > Hello Guys, > > > > I want to shape 2 vlans(10 and 20) to 4Mb and give one of them priority > > over the other one. Any idea how to do this in a hirarchical MQC? > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > > > -- Thanks Larry Hadrava CCIE #12203 CCNP Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Aug 05 2009 - 07:48:07 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:56 ART