Re: CCIE Amnesty?.....can we end it.....

well said Pual :)

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Paul Dardinski <pauld_at_marshallcomm.com>wrote:

> Darby......
>
> Can we let this go now? Seriously, I mean this in the best way, but
> truly the origins of this board were for CCIE lab study. In fact, unless
> it has changed, it used to be required that you a) were a ccie or b) had
> a lab scheduled.
>
> I know lots of storage has been wasted telling you that realistically if
> you spent one tenth of your time actually focused studying vs.
> writing/blogging/waxing prosaic, you'd have been an RS by now. I don't
> think you have taken a lab in 3 years and hence I simply can't
> understand your deep concern with all things CCIE. CCIE amnesty, demise
> of vendors, etc) I know you have purchased every lab product ever
> produced and been to every bootcamp ever given, so you have a vested
> interest I guess, but I can't see how even the current amnesty issue has
> anything to do with a non-ccie.
>
> All that said, sometimes you actually respond to technical questions and
> that is fine. Personally I usually follow GS just to keep updated on
> things, but mostly go elsewhere these days as there is very little voice
> discussion here. (current track I'm working on)
>
> Just my $0.02.
>
> Paul (#16842 RS/Sec)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Darby Weaver
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 4:03 AM
> To: hestia ta
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: CCIE Amnesty?
>
> I think I mentioned this earlier.
>
> Cisco is big enough to be vocal when they need to be.
>
> It does not serve any headhunter for Partners to make deals with CCIE's
> or
> other Cisco or even non-Cisco types directly.
>
> Again consider the source.
>
> Cisco is a multi-billion dollar company the last time I checked...
> (well I
> did not actually look but I know I've helped send quite a few millions
> their
> way this past decade).
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:20 AM, hestia ta <hestiata_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The only thing worse than all of this back and forth is that this
> > "program" is coming from a headhunter , who, no matter how many people
> > he has "helped", is still in the business of building a database of
> > companies and CCIES. He does not work *for* Cisco.
> >
> > Cisco should conduct something like this on their own, and if they
> > can't be arsed to do such a thing, then everything else should remain
> > as is.
> >
> > All you're doing is giving this bloke more people to spam and
> > companies to "do business" with.
> >
> > At the end of the day, this "program" will cause CCIES and partners to
> > lose money....and the "mastermind" of it all laughs all the way to the
> > bank.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Salah
CCIE #24207
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net