Re: One Misconception about lab

Hi Charles,

It's my understanding that the no frame-relay inverse-arp will keep the
device from trying to dynamically detect distant end devices. I also
understood that there is no command that will prevent an interface
running frame encapsulation from responding to an inverse-arp request
and thus creating a dynamic link to the device it responded to.

That's my understanding of how it works anyway.

Terry

Charles.Henson_at_regions.com wrote:
> Guys,
> I'm a little confused on this. For every single lab out there
> regardless of the provider, you learn to use "no frame inv" to prevent the
> interface or DLCI from answering any requests that it receives. I
> understand how this works and I understand why this command alone can meet
> any requirements for "not using any dynamic mappings". The documentation on
> CCO is vague and Internet opinions are varied on "no arp frame-". I was
> under the impression that this command prevented the router from initiating
> requests. I always use both as a sanity check even though I'm completely
> aware the second is not technically necessary. It's just cleaner to me. Am
> I totally mistaken? Is "no arp frame-" a legacy or depreciated command? Or
> do I understand it correctly? Please don't tell me I'm missing a
> fundamental here....
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Anthony Faria <tfaria72_at_gmail.com>
>
> To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
>
> Cc: Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>, Charles.Henson_at_regions.com, Persio
> Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>
> Date: 07/23/2009 08:39
>
> Subject: Re: One Misconception about lab
>
>
>
>
>
>
> LOL that will fix it. does nothing arp frame
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Narbik Kocharians
> <narbikk_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>> One thing you are missing is the "no arp frame" that you have in your
>> configuration.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Kewl - Like I said as long as you are comfortable and you know why you
>>>
>> are
>>
>>> doing it. Sounds like you did and you got the digits to prove it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> For a reason that shall remain undisclosed, I needed to reboot one of
>>>>
>> my
>>
>>>> routers with about 20 minutes left. Was I nervous? Of course not...
>>>>
> ;-)
>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Narbik Kocharians
>> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> www.MicronicsTraining.com
>> Sr. Technical Instructor
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 23 2009 - 10:32:48 ART