Good morning Dennis.
Thanks for the clarification. I guess I was a little confused on this.
Charles
From: Dennis Worth <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com>
To: Charles.Henson_at_regions.com
Cc: Anthony Faria <tfaria72_at_gmail.com>, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>,
nobody_at_groupstudy.com, Persio Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com>
Date: 07/23/2009 09:24
Subject: Re: One Misconception about lab
From what I am aware of, no arp frame-relay should be removed from the ios,
as frame-relay has no concept of arp at all. Please correct me if I am
wrong.
Also make sure if you decide to change encapsulations on an interface to
copy the current config on that interface or you will be retyping
everything.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:01 AM, <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com> wrote:
Guys, I'm a little confused on this. For every single lab out there
regardless of the provider, you learn to use "no frame inv" to prevent
the
interface or DLCI from answering any requests that it receives. I
understand how this works and I understand why this command alone can
meet
any requirements for "not using any dynamic mappings". The documentation
on
CCO is vague and Internet opinions are varied on "no arp frame-". I was
under the impression that this command prevented the router from
initiating
requests. I always use both as a sanity check even though I'm completely
aware the second is not technically necessary. It's just cleaner to me.
Am
I totally mistaken? Is "no arp frame-" a legacy or depreciated command?
Or
do I understand it correctly? Please don't tell me I'm missing a
fundamental here....
Charles From: Anthony Faria <tfaria72_at_gmail.com> To: Narbik
Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> Cc: Darby Weaver <
ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>,
Charles.Henson_at_regions.com, Persio Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com>,
Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> Date: 07/23/2009 08:39
Subject: Re: One Misconception about lab
LOL that will fix it. does nothing arp frame
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Narbik Kocharians
<narbikk_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> One thing you are missing is the "no arp frame" that you have in your
> configuration.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Kewl - Like I said as long as you are comfortable and you know why
you
> are
> > doing it. Sounds like you did and you got the digits to prove it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For a reason that shall remain undisclosed, I needed to reboot one
of
> my
> > > routers with about 20 minutes left. Was I nervous? Of course not...
;-)
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
_______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining.com
> Sr. Technical Instructor
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Dennis Worth Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Jul 23 2009 - 09:28:31 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:23 ART