I think what Narbik is saying is focus on the technologies not on graded
labs. It sounds like he wants to reinforce what you know and get your
confidence up. Once your confidence is up then everything is easier. Just my
opinion. I am not saying graded labs are bad I am just trying to explain
where Narbik is coming from (at least I hope I am right lol). There is a
method to his madness.
Tony
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The only issue with graded labs is the difficulty level. Admit there are
> eye-openers but the biggest opportunity I see in this entire industry is
> graded labs that are about as difficult as the real lab might be for
> someone.
>
> The idea of simply making labs that take more than 8 hours or test content
> not found in the blueprint and thus never appear on the real lab is not a
> valuable estimation of how one might expect to perform under the pressure
> and time contraints in a real lab.
>
> I do find graded labs helpful.
>
> I just booked 9 of them last night.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 22 2009 - 05:17:38 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:23 ART