Re: Another FR newbie questions

Thanks All for the explanations.

cheers,
taufik

2009/7/17 Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>

> Yes. On that basis if you had multiple spokes to get to, you would only
> need one broadcast parameter in your maps. Another gotcha is the frame-map
> to your own IP so you can ping it. Not the broadcast situation but another
> frame-map type thing.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Astorino" <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
> To: "Gary Duncanson" <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>
> Cc: "CCIE Groupstudy" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:58 PM
>
> Subject: Re: Another FR newbie questions
>
>
> Yes, all the broadcast keyword does is essentially say "if I have any
>> broadcast/multicast traffic send it out this DLCI" so...no need to have it
>> twice on one DLCI even if the DLCIs map to different IP addresses
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>
>>
>> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:55:25
>> To: <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
>> Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Re: Another FR newbie questions
>>
>>
>> That's my understanding yes.
>>
>> Rgds
>> Gary
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Astorino" <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>> >
>> To: "Gary Duncanson" <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>; "Taufik Kurniawan"
>> <ktaufik_at_gmail.com>
>> Cc: "CCIE Groupstudy" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: Another FR newbie questions
>>
>>
>> It really makes no difference if you put the broadcast on the map to the
>>> hub or the map to the spoke. The point is just do it once per DLCI.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
>>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>>> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:41:43
>>> To: Taufik Kurniawan<ktaufik_at_gmail.com>
>>> Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Another FR newbie questions
>>>
>>>
>>> In your frame-maps on the spokes, you don't need a broadcast parameter
>>> for
>>> the mapping to hub. You do for the mapping to the other spoke(s).
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Gary
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Taufik Kurniawan" <ktaufik_at_gmail.com
>>> >
>>> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; <
>>> cisco_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:19 PM
>>> Subject: Another FR newbie questions
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. what does " not to send redundant broadcast traffic from the spoke to
>>>> hub
>>>> " means in hub-spoke FR ? Can anyone explain in layman term ....and
>>>> what
>>>> about not to send redundant broadcast traffic from the hub to spoke ?
>>>> 2. confused below ping result ... !!!
>>>>
>>>> R1:
>>>>
>>>> !
>>>> interface Serial0/0
>>>> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
>>>> encapsulation frame-relay
>>>> clock rate 2000000
>>>> frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.3 103
>>>> frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.2 102
>>>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R2 :
>>>> !
>>>> interface Serial0/0.201 point-to-point
>>>> ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
>>>> snmp trap link-status
>>>> frame-relay interface-dlci 201
>>>> !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R3 :
>>>> !
>>>> interface Serial0/0
>>>> no ip address
>>>> encapsulation frame-relay
>>>> clock rate 2000000
>>>> !
>>>> interface Serial0/0.301 point-to-point
>>>> ip address 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
>>>> snmp trap link-status
>>>> frame-relay interface-dlci 301
>>>> !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R2#ping 10.0.0.2
>>>>
>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>>> !!!!!
>>>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 16/90/176 ms
>>>> R2#
>>>>
>>>> R3#ping 10.0.0.3
>>>>
>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>>> !!!!!
>>>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/60/184 ms
>>>> R3#
>>>>
>>>> and below is what i don't understand ... :-(
>>>> =============
>>>>
>>>> R1#ping 10.0.0.1
>>>>
>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>>>
>>>> *Mar 1 00:50:18.963: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP)
>>>> *Mar 1 00:50:19.163: Serial0/0(i): dlci 103(0x1871), pkt type 0x2000,
>>>> datagramsize 335.
>>>> *Mar 1 00:50:20.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>>>> *Mar 1 00:50:22.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>>>> *Mar 1 00:50:24.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>>>> *Mar 1 00:50:26.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>>>> Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>>>> R1#
>>>>
>>>> =============
>>>>
>>>> Why i cannot ping my own serial/fr interface ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jul 19 2009 - 01:47:45 ART