Re: adverising loopback in OSPF Domain

From: Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:30:18 +0300

not all the times we must use it sometimes they don't want to use this one
unless they mention it

I think no harm from keeping the /32 one?....it will ping anyway :)

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ramanpreet Singh
  To: Mohamed El Henawy
  Cc: Cisco certification
  Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:59 PM
  Subject: Re: adverising loopback in OSPF Domain

  Always remember to use ip ospf network point-to-point" in loopback interface
config to advertise actual subnet mask.

  -Raman

  On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>
wrote:

    Thank you All for your replies..

    last question....during redistribution part if I found that there is
network here or there need to be advertised...do I have to do it redistribute
connected and match the other interfaces in the routing table or I can
advertise it in any routing protocol running ?

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mohamed El Henawy"
<m.henawy_at_link.net>
    To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
    Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:11 PM
    Subject: adverising loopback in OSPF Domain

      Hello Group ,

      this might be silly question but its really bothering me

      when I'm asked to advertise "loopback in the OSPF Domain" do I have
toe
      redistribute it or I can just advertise it in any OSPF Area on the
      router/switch ?

      Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

      _______________________________________________________________________
      Subscription information may be found at:
      http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

    Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

    _______________________________________________________________________
    Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 17 2009 - 19:30:18 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART