Re: Auto-Summary in Lab

From: <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:48:59 -0400

I agree with everyone else. They're not always out to trick you. I think
you should obey the best practices unless told otherwise. I haven't taken
it yet but in my practice labs I have spent alot of time going back and
turning these things on when it prevented other parts of the lab from
working. Things like auto-summary, redistributing subnets from ospf, ,vtp
version 2 (now default) should all be enabled unless they say otherwise.
If you try to do exactly as they say and nothing else you my end up
running out of time because you had to go back and go back and enable
alot of features that are second nature in the real world.

Keegan

From:
Ravi Singh <way2ccie_at_googlemail.com>
To:
Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Date:
07/16/2009 11:31 PM
Subject:
Auto-Summary in Lab
Sent by:
nobody_at_groupstudy.com

Hi Group,

A quick one !!!

In the lab, Am I expected to disable auto-summary for protocols like
RIP/EIGRP only if it is mentioned in the task . The routing table changes
quite drastically with and without auto-summary so this can affect the IP
reachability required in the lab ;-) . Everywhere I find, the solution for
a
task disables auto-summary even if it is not mentioned to do so ..

Or is it one of the "Ask the Proctor?" questions ?? I don't think so ;-)

Thanks,
Ravi

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 17 2009 - 10:48:59 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART