Re: Another FR newbie questions

That's my understanding yes.

Rgds
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Astorino" <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
To: "Gary Duncanson" <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>; "Taufik Kurniawan"
<ktaufik_at_gmail.com>
Cc: "CCIE Groupstudy" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Another FR newbie questions

> It really makes no difference if you put the broadcast on the map to the
> hub or the map to the spoke. The point is just do it once per DLCI.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>
>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:41:43
> To: Taufik Kurniawan<ktaufik_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Another FR newbie questions
>
>
> In your frame-maps on the spokes, you don't need a broadcast parameter for
> the mapping to hub. You do for the mapping to the other spoke(s).
>
> HTH
>
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Taufik Kurniawan" <ktaufik_at_gmail.com>
> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; <cisco_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:19 PM
> Subject: Another FR newbie questions
>
>
>> 1. what does " not to send redundant broadcast traffic from the spoke to
>> hub
>> " means in hub-spoke FR ? Can anyone explain in layman term ....and what
>> about not to send redundant broadcast traffic from the hub to spoke ?
>> 2. confused below ping result ... !!!
>>
>> R1:
>>
>> !
>> interface Serial0/0
>> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> clock rate 2000000
>> frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.3 103
>> frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.2 102
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>>
>>
>> R2 :
>> !
>> interface Serial0/0.201 point-to-point
>> ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
>> snmp trap link-status
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 201
>> !
>>
>>
>> R3 :
>> !
>> interface Serial0/0
>> no ip address
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> clock rate 2000000
>> !
>> interface Serial0/0.301 point-to-point
>> ip address 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
>> snmp trap link-status
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 301
>> !
>>
>>
>> R2#ping 10.0.0.2
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>> !!!!!
>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 16/90/176 ms
>> R2#
>>
>> R3#ping 10.0.0.3
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
>> !!!!!
>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/60/184 ms
>> R3#
>>
>> and below is what i don't understand ... :-(
>> =============
>>
>> R1#ping 10.0.0.1
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>
>> *Mar 1 00:50:18.963: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP)
>> *Mar 1 00:50:19.163: Serial0/0(i): dlci 103(0x1871), pkt type 0x2000,
>> datagramsize 335.
>> *Mar 1 00:50:20.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>> *Mar 1 00:50:22.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>> *Mar 1 00:50:24.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>> *Mar 1 00:50:26.959: Serial0/0:Encaps failed--no map entry link 7(IP).
>> Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>> R1#
>>
>> =============
>>
>> Why i cannot ping my own serial/fr interface ?
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 16 2009 - 20:55:25 ART