RE: OT- Cisco 7609 Switch

No I was just wrong... The point was that the 7609 was made to support
carrier technologies that use ethernet similar to the Juniper MX series.

RE: OT- Cisco 7609 Switch

Ryan West
to:
Shaughn Smith, 'Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com', 'Alexei Monastyrnyi'
07/14/09 11:40 AM

Cc:
'Bhuvanesh Rajput', 'GS CCIE-Lab' , 'jockey wearer',
"'nobody_at_groupstudy.com'", 'Pavel Bykov'

Maybe you meant VPLS?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Shaughn Smith
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 8:11 AM
To: 'Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com'; 'Alexei Monastyrnyi'
Cc: 'Bhuvanesh Rajput'; 'GS CCIE-Lab'; 'jockey wearer';
'nobody_at_groupstudy.com'; 'Pavel Bykov'
Subject: RE: OT- Cisco 7609 Switch

6509 does support MPLS

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:44 PM
To: Alexei Monastyrnyi
Cc: Bhuvanesh Rajput; GS CCIE-Lab; jockey wearer; nobody_at_groupstudy.com;
Pavel Bykov
Subject: Re: OT- Cisco 7609 Switch

I think the difference is similar to the 3750-G/E series and the ME
models. One is built to support ethernet in a LAN or datacenter and the
other is to support LAN services such as Metro-e and VPLS. For example, I
don't believe the 6509 series supports MPLS at all which is the underlying
layer for most of these services.

Re: OT- Cisco 7609 Switch

Alexei Monastyrnyi
to:
jockey wearer
07/14/09 01:29 AM

Sent by:
nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Cc:
Bhuvanesh Rajput, Pavel Bykov, GS CCIE-Lab
Please respond to Alexei Monastyrnyi

About two years ago on Cisco Expo in Moscow I heard a question about
real differences between 6509 and 7609 platforms. The answer was that
those products, though looking "same-same" at that time, were to target
different user groups and even having common roots they would differ
more and more in features and cards supported over the time. Just a side
note which popped up in my mind.

A.

Bhuvanesh Rajput wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now a days, Sup 720 contains both RP ( Route Processor ) and SP ( Switch
> processor).
>
> RP for Routing process and
> SP for Switching process
> Both RP and SP are mounted on the MSFC3 ( Multi layer Switch Fabric
Card)
> daughter module on Sup 720 itself.
>
> Both RP and SP have diffrent bootflashes.
>
> If Sup 720 is being used on 7609 , BGP will definitely be suuported with
any
> release of IOS 12.2 SRB3/SRD1.
>
> *Function of SP on Sup 720 :-*
>
>
>>> System Initialization/Management
>>> Chassis Bootup
>>> Power Management
>>> Loading the Linecards
>>> Layer2 Protocols
>>>
> >>STP
> >>VTP
> >>CDP
>
>>> SPAN
>>> Broadcast Suppresion
>>> Etherchannel
>>>
>
> *Function of RP on Sup 720 :-*
> **
> *>>*L3 protocols
> >>BGP
> >>OSPF
> >> EIGRP
> >>ARP
> >> ICMP
> >>LDP
>
>>> Building the FIB table
>>> CLI user Interface
>>> IOS Configuration
>>>
>
>
> Brgds
> Bhuvanesh
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Pavel Bykov<slidersv_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. RSP is targeted for 7600, SUP is targeted for 6500.
>> RSP supports for example ES20 linecard that enables you to run VPLS
>> services.
>> Differences are, that RSP runs SRx software (12.2SRD currently) while
SUP
>> runs SXx software (currently 12.2SXI)
>> To find the difference between these softwares, see point number 2.
>>
>>
>> 2. Feature Navigator or Feature Comparison tool.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, jockey wearer <jockeywearer_at_gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Can somebody tell me
>>>
>>> 1) What is real differnce between selecting Route Switch Processor
>>>
> RSP-720(
>
>>>
> 7606S-RSP720C-P<
javascript:parent.configureByCategory_top.showOI(parent.configureByCategory_top.row,2,'1_0',true)

;>)
>
>>> module Vs Sup
>>>
>>>
> 720(7606S-SUP720B-R<
javascript:parent.configureByCategory_top.showOI(parent.configureByCategory_top.row,46,'1_5',true)

;>)
>
>>> module in 7609 Router .
>>>
>>> 2)How can I determine that IOS is supported BGP or not .
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Prashant
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>>
Received on Tue Jul 14 2009 - 12:15:29 ART