RE: The State of the CCIE Training Industry

From: Travis Niedens <niedentj_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:23:56 -0700

I have learned a few things in life that may help with this:

1. crack killls
2. Jesus saves
3. Beating a dead horse is pointless
4. These items apply to most lengthy email threads

I think it's time for some to put down the pipe, say a prayer and get back to
studying. I guarantee none of this is required for any CCIE exam.

Travis

> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:49:02 -0700
> Subject: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
> From: tfaria72_at_gmail.com
> To: ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Sometimes you build an empire then have others run it. We all want to
retire
> that is the goal or at least not work as hard. I dunno what happened with
> Brian but if I was Brian and had all those employees I would just run the
> company and relax a bit but that would be me.
>
>
> Tony
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> >
> > My biggest concern was the piracy thing and its effect on the vendors
> > here. I'm a little more recently vested than 5 years and a bit more
heavily
> > vested than most I'd suspect - well a much as some who go to alot of
classes
> > or products before finally passing. Kewl - You got me.
> >
> > The problem is the sales and the industry. When I hear vendors who
support
> > us, the candidates, and those vendors are DEEPLY concerned about their
> > income making opportunities. It's not my income or yours, TODAY. Maybe
> > TOMORROW.
> >
> > When the man who said the CCIE 2.0 Program is going to stand and deliver
> > and take on the tyranny of other programs... aka Brian Dennis and then
he
> > as much as disappears or becomes STRANGELY quiet and his formerly biggest
> > NEMESIS now speaks for HIM...
> >
> > I find that odd.
> >
> > I call it OIL and WATER. And no I never thought mix well either.
> >
> > Now Brian Dennis is a person entitled to his privacy. I'll buy that.
> >
> > Brian Dennis may not see fit to post on Groupstudy - I understand there
are
> > some reasons why this may be so too.
> >
> > Brian Dennis may not even care to post on InternetworkExpert's own Forum
> > for the past year - almost to the day now - I guess it is his forum (or
was)
> > and if he does not wish to post that's his business too.
> >
> > Brian Dennis can teach the CCNP to his heart's content - hey he's more
than
> > qualified. He is MORE THAN quaified.
> >
> > Brian Dennis can let Scott Morris speak for him.... I find it odd,
> > strange, and peculiar. But hey, apparently a few people here find my
posts
> > odd and peculiar too.
> >
> > For all I know Brian is cremated in a box and he still gets reports. Not
> > my concern as many have said the show must go on - with or without Brian
> > Dennis.
> >
> >
> >
> > One way or the other - Brian Dennis appears to be effectively removed
from
> > the public stage. Whether alive or dead, working or unemployed, wealthy
or
> > impoverished, it probably won't matter...
> >
> > Or will it?
> >
> > For all I know Brian Dennis is working on a killer CCIE Voice program for
> > InternetworkExpert - he passed and so did Petr. Two of the most skilled
and
> > birghtest guys in the industry. Can't wait to see the product.
> >
> > I just did not quite understnad why Petr was taking resumes for another
> > CCIE Voice - but someone's got to teach I guess.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Now anyone else but me find this funny?
> >
> >
> > Ouch!
> >
> >
> > Bruce Caslow reports a lot of development for the 360 program for Voice -
> > maybe there is a suprise in store for us all.
> >
> >
> > No I never really cared where Carmen San Diego was...
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Enjoy guys.
> >
> > I think this should leave some room for interpretation. I'm taking my
> > vacation now.
> >
> > Enjoy!
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 13 2009 - 10:23:56 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART