Re: EIGRP authentication using key chain with validity period

From: G2 <farawayguy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:54:20 +0300

Scott,

During a mock lab I did last week with INE, I issued a reboot and
everything looked good once it came back up. However, I guess I
wasn't thorough enough. One of the edge switches did not install its
BGP routes into the RIB for some odd reason, even though there was a
default route so the next hop was reachable. After looking over the
configs everything was correct with it but I did not get the points
for the section. I queried the proctor and he basically said it may
have been an order of operations issue and I just needed to clear the
adjacency.

I guess my point is that even though the configurations were exactly
correct, the snapshot that was taken did not function. I assume this
will be the same type of grading system on the real lab, correct?

Thanks,
Gary

On Jul 11, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Scott Morris wrote:

> While power outages aren't part of the plan, they're always possible.
> The impact has changed a bit now for two reasons that have been well
> pointed out by Cisco/proctors in Ask-the-expert...
>
> 1. the equipment is centrally located in SJC now as opposed to spread
> out globally. Centrally managed and such.
> 2. The equipment being used has a clock chip so even if you do
> reboot,
> THAT part isn't an issue.
>
> OSPF DR/BDR is another issue, but if a student has been paying
> attention
> in (hopefully) any bootcamp, they should be painfully aware of what to
> look for and what not to get caught by.
>
> If a candidate has a planned reload schedule to re-check their items
> (lunch and mid-afternoon in my recommendations) then they needn't have
> anything to worry about, or in case they forget the OSPF DR thing,
> they
> have plenty of time still to figure it out. No surprises.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Darby Weaver wrote:
>> Agreed. However I've been to some classes where some might lead
>> students to
>> think otherwise. Proctors will warn of power fluctuations or small
>> outages
>> and one should always be prepared for this type of contingency.
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Nope, they don't touch 'em. There's enough other show commands to
>>> know
>>> who will be DR after a reload! :) They only used to in the two-
>>> day
>>> format.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
>>> #4713,
>>>
>>> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>>>
>>> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>>
>>> evil_at_ine.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>>
>>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/
>>> >
>>>
>>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>>
>>> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>>>
>>>
>>> Knowledge is power.
>>>
>>> Power corrupts.
>>>
>>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hammer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Scott,
>>>> I thought that the proctors usually reloaded the rack before
>>>> grading? To make sure OSPF DRs were set right and whatnot. I know
>>>> it
>>>> can all be gleamed from configs "ip ospf priority blah" but I
>>>> thought
>>>> that they mostly did show commands to grade you in the scripting.
>>>> Is
>>>> bouncing the rack something they used to do but not anymore?
>>>>
>>>> -Hammer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com
>>>>
>>>> <mailto:smorris_at_ine.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The ISR routers used on the real lab have a CMOS clock, so
>>>> they will
>>>> retain their time on reload.
>>>>
>>>> Your lab will not be reloaded prior to grading.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anh Khoa Le Viet wrote:
>>>>> Hi Group,
>>>>>
>>>>> I took a mock lab from a vendor today with task about the EIGRP
>>>>> authentication: An MD5 hash of the password CISCO1 should be
>>>> used from
>>>>> 12:00AM on
>>>>> 1/1/2006 to 11:59PM on 12/31/2006 and An MD5 hash of the
>>>> password CISCO2
>>>>> should be used after this. I think I come out with the right
>>>> solution:
>>>>>
>>>>> key chain EIGRP
>>>>> key 1
>>>>> key-string CISCO1
>>>>> accept-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2006 00:29:59 Jan 1 2007
>>>>> send-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2006 11:59:59 Dec 31 2006
>>>>> key 2
>>>>> key-string CISCO2
>>>>> accept-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2007 infinite
>>>>> send-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2007 infinite
>>>>>
>>>>> But the thing is: do we need to configure ntp server and client
>>>> for this
>>>>> kind of task? At the time I did the configuration, the clock
>>>> showed in
>>>>> Routers is 2009 year time. But at the end of the lab, I did
>>>> reboot all the
>>>>> routers and found out that EIGRP did come up, quickly found that
>>>> the clock
>>>>> was back to 2002 and no EIGRP neighbors came up :(. We can not
>>>> do set
>>>>> datetime manually on the routers as if we reboot, it will came
>>>> back to
>>>>> default datetime, so the only option is NTP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you pleas give some advise on this kind of task? Should we
>>>> add NTP in
>>>>> the real lab or no need to do that if in the IP Services
>>>> portion, no NTP
>>>>> task?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and best Regards,
>>>>> Khoa
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 11 2009 - 23:54:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART