Please god, tell me that nuclear science is able to differentiate
between "up to" and "including".
Of not, we are all so incredibly hosed.
Two difference command sets: Key Chain times vs. ACL Time-Range times
have entirely different treatments and syntaxes. A candidate should be
aware of both as well as what the difference in semantics happens to be.
*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
evil_at_ine.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
Darby Weaver wrote:
> There is always a little debate on this question - I think the consensus is
> to make the lab work wherever possible. So setting the clock seems
> obvious. 8:00am versus 7:59am - > I'd check with the proctor. Since to me
> the two are remarkable different as in the 7:59 does not equal 8:00 - Hey
> I studied Nuclear Science - what do I know about math.
>
> Asking the proctor is not a bad thing and it lets the proctor know you have
> a clue too. It seems that this may be worthwhile in a world of OEQ.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Anh Khoa Le Viet <lvakhoa_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Group,
>>
>> I took a mock lab from a vendor today with task about the EIGRP
>> authentication: An MD5 hash of the password CISCO1 should be used from
>> 12:00AM on
>> 1/1/2006 to 11:59PM on 12/31/2006 and An MD5 hash of the password CISCO2
>> should be used after this. I think I come out with the right solution:
>>
>> key chain EIGRP
>> key 1
>> key-string CISCO1
>> accept-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2006 00:29:59 Jan 1 2007
>> send-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2006 11:59:59 Dec 31 2006
>> key 2
>> key-string CISCO2
>> accept-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2007 infinite
>> send-lifetime 00:00:00 Jan 1 2007 infinite
>>
>> But the thing is: do we need to configure ntp server and client for this
>> kind of task? At the time I did the configuration, the clock showed in
>> Routers is 2009 year time. But at the end of the lab, I did reboot all the
>> routers and found out that EIGRP did come up, quickly found that the clock
>> was back to 2002 and no EIGRP neighbors came up :(. We can not do set
>> datetime manually on the routers as if we reboot, it will came back to
>> default datetime, so the only option is NTP.
>>
>> Could you pleas give some advise on this kind of task? Should we add NTP in
>> the real lab or no need to do that if in the IP Services portion, no NTP
>> task?
>>
>> Thanks and best Regards,
>> Khoa
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 11 2009 - 13:54:20 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART