Re: VERY OT: POE over SFP module

From: Dennis Worth <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:28:01 -0700

Andrew,
I thought it should to, but no go! The ASICS of either the SFP or SWITCH
must not support the power from the brick to the AP. I guess Cisco will get
more money or the electrical guys will get it.

Thanks for the help,

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:37 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> This should work. Use a gig port with a copper spf and use a power
> injector. Should be fine, I have not used the spfs for this app, but using
> power injectors in the past have worked fine and IMO there should not be any
> issues in this. Of course a quick lab test is best ...
>
> Not sure how much I added, but I HTH,
>
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Dennis Worth <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> This actually started when a new wireless deployment initiative came in
>> after deploying the 10/100 3560 switches. The plan came up to start running
>> N-Wireless and for that to happen efficiently, a Gig port is needed. The
>> work around for this is to run a Copper Ethernet SPF and use a power brick
>> which had to be local to the AP and not up stream at the switch side. The
>> true issue with that, is power in the ceilings to plug an AP is not always
>> readily available, thus having to have not only cabling ran, but also power.
>> Hope I said that right, I've been studying for 4 days straight, so my
>> verbage may be off.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Are you asking about a power injector for a fiber port? Sending power
>>> over light? I have never heard of a PD'ed device have a fiber hook up ...
>>>
>>> When I think of PD'ed devices, I think of IP cameras, APs, some low end
>>> switches (uses the copper ports), etc ... any of the POE switches can
>>> deliver power to these types of devices and you don't need to burn one of
>>> your uplink ports for this. How much power you need, will influence the
>>> switch you buy.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Muhammad Nasim <
>>> muhammad.nasim_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You mean to say that the SFP module in 3560 (which is usually used for
>>>> uplink) and there are minimum two or maximum 4 SFP (LX OR LH OR GT) on
>>>> the
>>>> switches, I don't think so there is any need or requirement to have POE
>>>> on
>>>> these 2 or 4 ports on 3560.
>>>> Juniper does support some of the ports in POE for example in a 24 port
>>>> switches juniper has 8 or 12 ports POE or rest or not (partial POE ) you
>>>> can
>>>> say ( I don't remember the exact partial POE ports on it)
>>>>
>>>> My answer is NO that there are no SFP modules which supports POE on 3560
>>>> 10/100
>>>>
>>>> HTH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/7/10 Dennis Worth <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> > Hey group,
>>>> > Has any come across an SFP module able to run POE for a 3560 10/100
>>>> POE
>>>> > switch? I thought I read you could do this, but it must be another
>>>> switch
>>>> > brand.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Dennis Worth
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Muhammad Nasim
>>>> Network Engineer
>>>> Saudi Arabia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dennis Worth
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>

-- 
Dennis Worth
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 10 2009 - 20:28:01 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART