Hi. This refers to if you have for example:
network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255
aggregate-address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
then network one will be preferred.
Here is an example (i had to aggregate to something other than /32 to get
the route into BGP TABLE)
R2#sh ip bgp 2.2.2.0
BGP routing table entry for 2.2.2.0/24, version 6
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x820
Advertised to update-groups:
1 2
Local, (aggregated by 20 2.2.2.2)
0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (2.2.2.2)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, aggregated, local,
atomic-aggregate, best
R2#sh ip bgp 2.2.2.2
BGP routing table entry for 2.2.2.2/32, version 3
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Advertised to update-groups:
1 2
Local
0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (2.2.2.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced,
local, best
As you can see:
locally aggregated PAs: Origin IGP, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid,
aggregated, local, atomic-aggregate, best
locally originated PAs: Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768,
valid, sourced, local, best
The difference is where originated states "sourced", while aggregated states
"aggregated".
So if you'd have the case where two refer to the same network, bgp would
choose "sourced" before "aggregated"
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:37 AM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> please advise in bgp best path selection step 3 says
>
> Prefer locally originated route
> A locally sourced path is better than a locally aggregated path?????
>
> what doe it mean ?
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Pavel Bykov ---------------- Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/ Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Jul 09 2009 - 08:33:02 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART