Correct config:
!
router rip
version 2
passive-interface default
no passive-interface fast0/0
no passive-interface Loopback0
network 141.1.0.0
network 150.1.0.0
no auto-summary
!
It was from a new grad who happen to ask me :(-
Don't have access to a router. But, will run debug later tonight as to explain
why?
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:44:15 +0100
Subject: Re: passive-interface loop0 in RIP
From: ciscoleague_at_googlemail.com
To: ebay_products_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Assuming 141.1.0.0 is the interface participating in RIP and 150.1.0.0 is you
Lopback interface.
Give no passive-interface for the 141.1.0.0 interface and not the loopback 0.
I'll be happy to be proved wrong. That way I can correct my understanding.
:-)
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Cisco Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>
wrote:
All,
Simple configuration:
!
router rip
version 2
network 141.1.0.0
network 150.1.0.0
no auto-summary
!
Rack1R3#sir rip
141.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 10 subnets
R 141.1.6.0 [120/1] via 141.1.36.6, 00:00:23, FastEthernet0/1
150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 7 subnets, 2 masks
R 150.1.7.0/24 [120/1] via 141.1.37.7, 00:00:10, FastEthernet0/0 <--
But, now the configuration is done with passive-interface.
!
router rip
version 2
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Loopback0
network 141.1.0.0
network 150.1.0.0
no auto-summary
!
If you do "no passive-interface loopback0" the route is not seen. Not sure
why?
I don't see the 150.1.7.0/24 RIP route?
Rack1R3#sir rip
141.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 10 subnets
R 141.1.6.0 [120/1] via 141.1.36.6, 00:00:23, FastEthernet0/1
Any basic stuff which I am missing here?
-Yuri
Received on Wed Jul 08 2009 - 14:02:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART