Re: Bridging or PPPoFR ?

If it was me, I would have gone with PPPoFR only because to me it is simpler
to configure and it is less likely to present issues. But thats just me. As
long as you meet the requirements of the task and don't violate any rules,
you are good.

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Roy Waterman <roy.waterman_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Always good to know ones options.
>
>
> 2009/7/4 Naveen <navin.ms_at_gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In a FR Hub and spoke topology, the Hub is using a multipoint sub-if and
> > spokes are using point-2-point sub-if.
> >
> > The task says, DO NOT put IP address on the Hub multipoint interface. Is
> > this hinting to use Bridging over FR (or) PPPoFR ?
> >
> > I used Bridging and the solution used PPPoFR. How to decide which one to
> > use
> > ?
> >
> > TIA,
> > Naveen.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Roy
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Regards,
Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net