Re: IEWB volume 2 v4.1 vs V5

From: Salah ElShekeil <salah.elshekeil_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:19:58 +0300

yep that's right but I'm talking about BBs and physical connections ;)

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:

> 1. Nope
> 2. Nothing is different
> 3. Wording, topics and other miscellaneous features. ;)
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> evil_at_ine.com
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
>
>
>
> Vijay Ramasundaram wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Recently saw the IEWB volume 2 version 5 labs available on the members
> page
> > (about 12 labs).
> > I am currently sharing a rack with my colleagues at work who are doing
> the
> > version 4.1
> >
> > If I wanted to do version 5
> >
> > 1. Should I have to change the backbone device configs?
> > 2. Any physical cabling changes?
> > 3. What are the other differences between the versions?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vijay
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Salah
CCIE #24207
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 04 2009 - 16:19:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART