Re: as-override vs. allowas-in

I suppose it depends on your perspective. Purely technical, no, not
really. They both allow the route to come in.

Politically though, one you are solving on the SP side (presumably
knowing more than your customers do), the other you are forcing all your
customers to have different configurations with things they may not have
a clue why.

If you're doing managed CE routers, then there's no difference.

My two cents.

*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

evil_at_ine.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

Persio Pucci wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is there any pratical difference on whether using "as-override" on the PE
> side instead of "allowas-in" on the CE when using BGP as the PE-CE protocol
> with two sites using the same AS#?
>
> Persio
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 03 2009 - 11:23:29 ART