Re: monitor P router loopback address

I don't think so.
Routing should be bi-directional, and if it happens, it is security
issue for VRF.
Between VRFs, using import/export RT, it can share routes between
different VRFs if you carefully design it.
But not with Global Default routing table.

Alex

Bhuvanesh Rajput wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If routes are in Global Routing table...can't these be injected in vrf....??
>
> Brgds
> Bhuvanesh
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, jack daniels<jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> P router has loopback and has no vrf , so it belongs to Default global
>> routing table.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/7/2 Alex H. Ryu <r.hyunseog_at_ieee.org>
>>
>>
>>> What routing table does loopback ip address belong to ?
>>>
>>> VRF stands for Virtual Routing and Forwarding instance.
>>> Between VRFs, you may import/expot routing table to share the connectivity.
>>>
>>> But if loopback ip address are belong to Default_Routing table, which is
>>> not VRF,
>>> I don't think so.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> jack daniels wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi group ,
>>>>
>>>> I have a vrf X and I'm monitoring the LOOPBACKs of PE routers , now to
>>>> monitor P routers how can we make it ......
>>>> Monitoring is done on a server which is connected on VRF X
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> J.Daniels
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 02 2009 - 08:57:58 ART