Re: Redistribution into OSPF - Type 2

From: Con Spathas <ccie19226_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:26:57 +0100

RFC2328 - Section 16.4.6

(d) If the new AS external path is still indistinguishable
                from the current paths in the N's routing table entry,
                select the preferred path based on a least cost
                comparison. Type 1 external paths are compared by
                looking at the sum of the distance to the forwarding
                address and the advertised type 1 metric (X+Y). Type 2
                external paths advertising equal type 2 metrics are
                compared by looking at the distance to the forwarding
                addresses.

Just keep in mind this little nugget though...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080124c7d.shtml

Cheers.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Binoy Udayabhanu <binoy_uday_at_yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi experts,
>
> One doubt regarding redistribution in OSPF. When two OSPF ASBR's send in the
> same route into an OSPF domain, which will be preferred, especially when it is
> E2 route.
>
> Also, if the case is that the ASBR's are in two different areas of the same
> OSPF domain, is it going to cause any difference.
>
> Do the router-id of the ASBR's has any part in selecting them.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Binoy
>
>
>
> ICC World Twenty20 England &#39;09 exclusively on YAHOO! CRICKET
> http://cricket.yahoo.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jun 30 2009 - 21:26:57 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:38 ART