Re: Points break down - R&S Lab

From: Krzysztof Zaleski <cshyshtof_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:28:12 +0200

And that's exactly the most valuable key to success :-)

PS. I still think that CISCO should be more precise when posting exam rules :-)

--
Krzysztof Zaleski
CCVP, CCIE RS #24081
http://inetcon.org
2009/6/26 Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>:
> Agreed, Krzysztof. Prepare for a 100 mark test and then maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised if there are only 79 points on the lab portion. :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Zaleski
> Sent: Friday, 26 June 2009 6:32 AM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Points break down - R&S Lab
>
> This is what I don't get. I always thought that to attend any test
> (not only Cisco) you have to have a clear understanding how the test
> looks like (written, lab, mixed, etc), what is covered (blueprint),
> and how it is graded. Making a secret of grading procedure gives a
> feeling of unfairness. I have never seen CISCO's official statement
> saying that OEQ are worth this much, the rest of lab is worth this
> much. Why is it a secret? Does it mean that grading is a floating
> process? The rules are very blury in this area.
>
> Regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> --
> Krzysztof Zaleski
> CCVP, CCIE RS #24081
> http://inetcon.org
>
>
> 2009/6/26 Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>:
>> Without violating the NDA I can say that it may or may not vary depending on
>> which lab you take on any given day. Any more precise answer would be an NDA
>> violation. :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
>> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Molomo
>> Sent: Friday, 26 June 2009 5:53 AM
>> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Points break down - R&S Lab
>>
>> Experts,
>>
>> Without violating the NDA, how are the points allocated for R&S Lab?
>> From most postings it sounds like 21 points for OEQ. How are the
>> remaining 79 broken down?
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 26 2009 - 13:28:12 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:37 ART