RE: PVST Question

Excellent, glad I could help you out in understanding STP

Regards,

Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
  

From: walkingwithcisco [mailto:walkingwithcisco_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Joe Astorino
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: PVST Question

Hi Joe,

Thanks.
we can see on the switches is only written pvst. but it is pvst+.
clear for me now.

Regards,
Sai

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
wrote:

Also, remember that on modern switches you have 3 options right? Rapid,
MST, or the default PVSTP. So you will never really deal with the old
original 802.1D protocol on a modern Cisco switch. This is where it gets
confusing for me as well, because on the switch it says PVSTP but in reality
I believe it is PVSTP+

Regards,

Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
walkingwithcisco
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 8:07 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: PVST Question

Dear Experts,

I come across a question PVST when I'm reading BCMSN. Here is :

PVST requires the use of ISL Trunking Encap between switches. >> That means
we totally cannot use dot1q trunk if we are running PVST. ????

another notable point is (especially for Open Ended Question) :
In networks where PVST and CST coexist, interoperability problems occur.
Each require a different trunking method, so BPDUs are never exchanged
between STP types. >> It will probably come to us as a tricky question. In
real live network, that mean we cannot run CST and PVST together. ?????

Thanks.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jun 22 2009 - 09:13:03 ART