RE: Block Auto-RP message

From: Antonio Soares <amsoares_at_netcabo.pt>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:29:12 +0100

Basically it's the same. But remember that locally generated traffic is not affected by the outbound ACL. So with method 2, if that
router is a RP candidate and/or a Mapping Agent, the ACL with not have the desired effect. I think this is why the "ip multicast
boundary" command exists.

Regards,

Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
amsoares_at_netcabo.pt

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Rin
Sent: sexta-feira, 19 de Junho de 2009 10:18
To: 'Cisco certification'
Subject: Block Auto-RP message

Hi all,

 

Anyone find the differences between below methods to prevent Auto-RP message
leaking:

Method 1:

ip access-list standard FILTER_AUTORP

 deny 224.0.1.39

 deny 224.0.1.40

 permit any

!

interface Serial0/0

 ip multicast boundary FILTER_AUTORP

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Method 2:

ip access-list extended FILTER_AUTORP

 deny ip any host 224.0.1.39

 deny ip any host 224.0.1.40

 permit ip any any

!

interface Serial0/0

 ip access-group FILTER_AUTORP in

 ip access-group FILTER_AUTORP out

 

Thanks.

Rin.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 19 2009 - 11:29:12 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:37 ART