Re: Hub connected to an access port

From: Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:54:14 -0500

Hi Chris,

  Thank you for the respsonse.

Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Chris Breece <cbreece1_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> We use BPDUGuard and port security together in production.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks S Malik for the input
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:13 AM, S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > It shouild not be a problem. Both should work together.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
>> > anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Joe,
>> >>
>> >> No problem and thank you very much ,will try to lab it up,when get a
>> >> chance.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I don't recall reading about any limitation there, but when in doubt
>> >> LAB
>> >> > IT UP! I honestly don't recall off the top of my head.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >
>> >> > Joe Astorino
>> >> > CCIE #24347 (R&S)
>> >> > Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
>> >> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
>> http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
>> >> http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ------------------------------
>> >> > *From:* Anantha Subramanian Natarajan [mailto:
>> >> > anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com]
>> >> > *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2009 12:52 AM
>> >> > *To:* Joe Astorino; Cisco certification
>> >> > *Subject:* Re: Hub connected to an access port
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Joe,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you very much and thanks for the port-security feature
>> suggestion
>> >> > here.One question on this is,can we enable port security on access
>> port
>> >> in
>> >> > addition to bpduguard/portfast feature.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Joe Astorino
>> >> <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Well, I would use bpduguard as you said to start with...this will do
>> >> what
>> >> >> you want generally if somebody plugs in any kind of switch that
>> >> actually
>> >> >> runs STP. BUT regarding the hub like you said, or switches that
>> just
>> >> are
>> >> >> not that advanced you have to dig deeper. How about port-security
>> with
>> >> a
>> >> >> maximum of 1 MAC address? As soon as more than 1 user MAC address
>> >> comes
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> the port, it will shut down. Of course they could technically have
>> a
>> >> hub
>> >> >> plugged in with only 1 user but ... Not likely. I think those 2
>> things
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> solve about 99% of your issues.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Joe Astorino
>> >> >> CCIE #24347 (R&S)
>> >> >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
>> >> >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
>> http://www.ipexpert.com/> <
>> >> http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>> Behalf
>> >> Of
>> >> >> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>> >> >> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:37 AM
>> >> >> To: Cisco certification
>> >> >> Subject: Hub connected to an access port
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi All,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am trying to find an soultion on the below requirement.Any help
>> is
>> >> >> really appreciated.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The requirement is,an access port should be put in error disabled
>> >> state
>> >> >> if
>> >> >> an switch or hub is connected to that port.I am assuming that having
>> >> >> portfast enabled with bpdu guard feature on it would put the access
>> >> port
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> error disable state if an switch is connected.One problem which I
>> have
>> >> in
>> >> >> this solution is,if the connected switch has disabled BPDU on that
>> >> >> port,how
>> >> >> this access port would knaow about it and put the port in error
>> disable
>> >> >> state.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also,if the hub is connected,how the access port knows about it, as
>> I
>> >> am
>> >> >> assuming, Spanning tree protocol only runs on bridges and switches
>> >> which
>> >> >> are
>> >> >> 8012.1D compliant and so not in hub.I am thinking,may be I am wrong
>> in
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> assumption.Kindly help me to understand the same.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any other method to acheive the same.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for the assistance
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> >> >> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.54/2158 - Release Date:
>> >> 06/07/09
>> >> >> 05:53:00
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> >> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.54/2158 - Release Date:
>> >> 06/07/09
>> >> > 05:53:00
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 10 2009 - 09:54:14 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:37 ART