Re: Ipexpert section 5 v9 WB doubts.

Some good questions Andy.

Jared - In your labs, adding some words that mention "send a warning when
the routes reach 80% of the configured limit" might be nice. That kind of
wording will make most of us check the docs (a good exercise in itself.)

;-)

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Andy Hogard <andyhogard_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Jared sir,
>
>
> Thanks for the response. In task 5.4 and 5.5, in the solutions there is no
> need for the "broadcasts" keyword in the soultion. :)
>
>
> Will be glad, if you confirmed and corrected that as well.
>
>
> @ALL from NJ ..yeah, of course I did configure the summary on both the ABRs
> ..if you leave R6 ..then the unsummarised masked networks should trickle
> down to R9 which has area 0 running between R6 and himself.
>
>
> I mean I din't care to check, when the config was all loaded ..but I am
> 100%
> sure about thats the way it should be.. hence the clarification. Will
> re-run
> and confirm in some time.
>
>
> Regards,
> Andy H.
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Bryan has this nailed. The wording here is a little confusing due to the
> > word threshold matching the command keyword. Functionally you've
> configured
> > it correctly, Andy.
> >
> > I'll change the wording in the updates I'm working on for the RS 4.0 from
> > "threshold" to "limit" so no one has to be confused by it again once they
> > hit the press. :)
> >
> >
> > On 6/4/09 4:42 PM, "Bryan Bartik" <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Andy,
> > >
> > > I don't have v9 readily available, we are on v10 now :-) but...
> > >
> > > I see what you mean about 5.15. Especially since the percentage value
> is
> > > known as "threshold" in the command reference :-) In this case, 60 is
> the
> > > value and the percentage at which the warning is generated does not
> > matter.
> > >
> > > In a case where you have 2 ABR's, you might want to clarify that with
> the
> > > proctor, if you are feeling lucky. I think you have it nailed ;-)
> > >
> > > Bryan Bartik
> > > CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> > > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> > > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Andy Hogard <andyhogard_at_gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> *Task 5.15,*
> > >>
> > >> Assume that Area 78 will be redistributing Rip. Make sure that no more
> > than
> > >> 60 routes are learned via Rip before redistribution is stopped at that
> > >> threshold.
> > >>
> > >> The solution I configured on R7 and R8, is
> > >>
> > >> *conf t
> > >> router ospf 1
> > >> redistribute maximum-prefix 60 100
> > >> end*
> > >>
> > >> Here the threshold is set to 100, whereas in the PG the solution is
> > given
> > >> to
> > >> be *"redistribute maximum-prefix 60" *
> > >>
> > >> So when I re read the question ..and concentrate on the keywords in
> the
> > >> latter part of the question, *"redistribution is stopped at that
> > threshold"
> > >> * which implies that no matter what, the router must not re-distribute
> > more
> > >> than 60 external routes ..I mean they are reffering to* "60 routes as
> > the
> > >> threshold"* and are *really not bothered about what threshold value
> the
> > >> warning is genereated at. *
> > >>
> > >> Just the use of *"threshold" word in the question is making things
> > twisted
> > >> for me. *Am I correct with the explaination or with my solution?!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> One more,
> > >>
> > >> *Task 5.13*
> > >>
> > >> Summarise the networks advertised by R4, these networks are 172.4.0.4
> -
> > >> 172.4.3.4/24
> > >>
> > >> Now, since Router4 is a part of area 246 only ..and since area 246 has
> > two
> > >> ABRs Router2 and Router6. They both must be configured with *"area 246
> > >> range
> > >> 172.4.0.0 255.255.252.0".*
> > >>
> > >> I know I am correct on this one for sure(don't burst my bubble) but
> the
> > >> solution in the PG configures the summary on R2 only. Can you explain,
> > why
> > >> ?!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> There, is one from frame relay task as well ..but there I have figured
> > >> where
> > >> I went wrong, and have made a note of it. All other tasks were smooth.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I am looking forward hearing from my gurus at IpExpert and others as
> > well.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Andy H.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> My Blog URL: http://ccielog.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
> > Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> My Blog URL: http://ccielog.blogspot.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net