Piyush,
Ya piyush youare right! even I was in the same sitaution a month
ago.... I was pretty sure that I'll pass...But finally I failed in OEQ...
But I was very sure that I wrote everything right and didn't know what made
me fail. I wrote to Cisco regarding reread, the reply was re read is always
for small margin between pass and fail.... but from the report I can say
that I scored more than 63 in the lab out of 79.So, If I pass the OEQ I'll
be passed. But the margin is not in their limit for reread.. So I was denied
REREAD :(. No other go... I had to Admit that I failed and move on... Ya it
was the COSTLY LUNCH I ever had... that too I jus had a PINE APPLE JUICE for
$1400$ ROFL :P
ALL THE BEST BUDDY for your next attempt :)
-- With Regards, K.V.Madhu Prateek Reddy. On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Piyoush Sharma <piyoush_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Well that is another conundrum, I can only speculate, but since I passed > the > config part of the lab, I do not have a re-read option.. This would suggest > that one can only ask for a re-read if you do not pass the config part of > the lab. > > For the OEQs, initially it took me about 5 minutes to write out the > answers, > I then went back and verified them and read the question again to make sure > I was answering what was being asked. > > I was done with the OEQs in 15minutes. However, in retrospect, perhaps I > should not have re-visited the questions after typiing out my response. I > did change a bit in 3 of my answers, maybe that was my achilles heels... > > I am planning to take one my next attempt by September. Hopefully my > last!!! > > Piyoush. > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Scott Morris < > smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com > > wrote: > > > Glad to hear that you had your strategy down... Sorry that the OEQs > > chewed you up and spit you out. :( > > > > One option of course (assuming your answers were correct as you say!) is > to > > request a re-read. There's always the chance though, that the next > proctor > > would agree about the answer not being quite the one they were looking > for! > > > > Did you take your time on the OEQs? Or was it a read --> answer --> move > > on approach? > > > > Keep watching for open lab dates, you may yet find one before October! > I'm > > sure before next time, you'll fill in any blanks and rearrange your > strategy > > in order to go back and take what is rightly yours! > > > > > > > > > > *Scott Morris*, CCIE*x4* (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, > > > > JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. > > > > JNCI-M, JNCI-ER > > > > smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com > > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc. > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 > > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 > > > > > > Knowledge is power. > > > > Power corrupts. > > > > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil...... > > > > > > > > > > Piyoush Sharma wrote: > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > So I took the lab on May 27th. More like an expensive lunch.... > > As you can probably guess, I did not pass. The really frustrating part is > > that I passed the config, but got a 0 in OEQs > > Now I can tell you that you do not have to look at theory to pass the > OEQs. > > Nor do you need to memorize the RFC numbers etc. They are based on > concepts. > > I was sure that I answered the questions correctly... but I guess my > answers > > were not "Cisco's correct answers". > > > > Having said that, the lab itself was easy enough. I would say that with > the > > OEQs, they have made the lab alot easier. There were less caveats and/or > > tricks in that tasks. > > The config is 79 points with OEQ's being 21 points. > > > > I am not sure what I should do next, considering that I did pass the > config, > > I am pretty comfortable with my speed and every thing else. I finished > the > > lab with 2 hours remaining and verified all my answers. I reckon I scored > > enough points to pass the config part. I was a bit nervous about the > OEQs. > > The challenge is that the answer to those questions is tricky. They > (Cisco) > > says that the answer is normally not more than 1 sentenance. But it > depends > > on the interpretation of the answer. > > > > Anyways, just to let everyone who is preparing for the lab before Oct 18, > > ensure that you are clear on your concepts. Things like > > what does EIGRP use for metric calculation, what are the default > parameters > > it uses... > > what ospf types are compatible etc.. > > > > I used Internetwork Expert's vol 1,2 and 3. I took the Mock lab workshop > > that it helped to clarify a few things for me, as well as show some of > the > > common mistakes I was making. Scott, thank you for your insight on the > lab > > strategy. Because I read the lab 3 times, I was able to identify some of > the > > dependencies in tasks not directly mentioned. Those points, I believe > were > > crucial to scoring in the config portion. > > > > Piyoush. > > > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > > > -- With Regards, K.V.Madhu Prateek Reddy. Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Jun 02 2009 - 14:57:52 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:36 ART