Re: Redistribution Question...

From: Naufal Jamal <naufalccie_at_yahoo.in>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:23:38 +0530 (IST)

Hi Jitender,
 
Both the commands will hold the same effect.
subnets will be used for no summarisation of the networks that you want to
summarize.
metric type 1 will be used to add the link cost incrementally as the rip route
traverse thru the network.
 
Kindly correct if i am wrong...
 
NJ

--- On Sun, 31/5/09, Jitendra Anbu <Jitendra.Anbu_at_optus.com.au> wrote:

From: Jitendra Anbu <Jitendra.Anbu_at_optus.com.au>
Subject: Redistribution Question...
To: "CCIE R/S, Groupstudy" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Date: Sunday, 31 May, 2009, 1:03 PM

Hi all the experts at GS,

Can someone explain the difference when redistributing RIP into OSPF the
effect that it would have using the following two commands? Basically, I have
swapped the keyword SUBNETS with metric-type

R2(config-router)#redistribute rip subnets metric-type 1

R2(config-router)#redistribute rip metric-type 1 subnets

Thank you all

Cheers,

Jit

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 31 2009 - 23:23:38 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART