No, your explicit path is fine
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Splinter
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:31 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: MPLS TE clarification
Hi All,
i have a 3 router topology running mpls traffic eng.
R1---R2---R3
so on R1 I have configured the following.
tunnel13
ip unnumbered loop0
tunnel destination 10.10.3.3
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 7 7
tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 5000
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 explicit name TU13
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-selection metric te
ip explicit-path name TU26 enable
next-address 10.10.12.2
next-address 10.10.23.2
next-address 10.10.3.3
Do i need to have the ingress ip address of R3 in the explicit-path
next-address or is the above acceptable? hop from R2 to R3's loopback0
Splinter
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 28 2009 - 16:10:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART