Re: OSPF Distance Command .!

From: Sadiq Yakasai <sadiqtanko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:54:13 +0100

Gents, a little search over GS archives would second Bryan's point! This
issue hunted me down in my first attempt!

While some have even gone to TAC, others have tried bugging it! But from the
research I carried out a while ago, my conclusion is you are not to use AD
to influence prefix selection WITHIN the same routing protocol - use metric
instead! BETWEEN 2 or more routing protocols, use AD.

Otherwise, you are in for a long, unreliable and incoherent exercise.

Sadiq

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Divin, I think you hit it right on :) I have labbed this several times
> before and what I found was that you cannot use AD to prefer one ospf route
> over another in the same ospf process (There may be crazy scenarios where
> you can, but I don't recall finding any). Makes sense, since like you said
> AD is to prefer one protocol over another. You could place the link to R1
> in
> another process on R0 and then change the distance in that process.
>
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
CCIE #19963
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri May 22 2009 - 15:54:13 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART