thanks Jose,
will try it
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Jose Miguel Huertas <
JoseMiguel.huertas_at_telindus.es> wrote:
> Hi Salah,
>
> Let's put the next scenario:
>
> R1 [fa0/0] ---- [Fa0/0] R2
>
> Lo0 R1: 1.1.1.1 /32
> Fa0/0 R1: 12.12.12.1/24
>
> Lo0 R2: 2.2.2.2/32
> FA0/0 R2: 12.12.12.2/24
>
> On R1:
>
> int fa0/0
> ip nat outside
> ip nat outside source static udp 2.2.2.2 520 224.0.0.9 520
> ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 fa0/0 12.12.12.2
>
> On R2:
>
> int fa0/0
> ip nat outside
> ip nat outside source static udp 1.1.1.1 520 224.0.0.9 520
> ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 fa0/0 12.12.12.1
>
>
> Try this, it works. I'm sure there is another way to do it, but this one
> goes
> good.
>
>
> ________________________________
> De: Salah ElShekeil [mailto:salah.elshekeil_at_gmail.com]
> Enviado el: jueves, 21 de mayo de 2009 10:30
> Para: Jose Miguel Huertas
> CC: qospf qospf; Cisco certification
> Asunto: Re: forming RIPv2 adjacency in unicast?
>
> did u try it? I haven't seen this :-D ,
>
> if possible please post the lab conf.
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jose Miguel Huertas
> <JoseMiguel.huertas_at_telindus.es<mailto:JoseMiguel.huertas_at_telindus.es>>
> wrote:
> This is one of the most weird things I've seen. You have to use NAT to
> translate the multicast address into a unicast address.
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: nobody_at_groupstudy.com<mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
> [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com<mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>] En nombre de
> Salah ElShekeil
> Enviado el: jueves, 21 de mayo de 2009 9:46
> Para: qospf qospf
> CC: Cisco certification
> Asunto: Re: forming RIPv2 adjacency in unicast?
>
> how u would do it without neighbor command?
>
>
>
> by default RIPv2 to multicast group , the only command will change this
> behavior to unicast is neighbor command :-) ,
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM, qospf qospf
> <cisco.qospf_at_gmail.com<mailto:cisco.qospf_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > what are the ways of forming RIPv2 adjacency using unicast only (no
> > bcast/multicast allowed) assuming that you can't use the neighbor
> > command....any ideas?
> >
> > thx
> >
> > --
> > --------
> > check out my blog! http://qospf.wordpress.com<
> http://qospf.wordpress.com/>
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net<http://www.ccie.net/>
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Salah
> CCIE# 24207
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net<http://www.ccie.net/>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net<http://www.ccie.net/>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Salah
> CCIE# 24207
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Salah CCIE# 24207 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu May 21 2009 - 14:32:44 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART