Re: Is this a bug?

Nope, just wrong command
In this particular hardware implementation use:
*show platform* port-asic stats drop

also "show platform pm" is very usefull for counters and interface to asic
mappings.

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:15 PM, <mihai.grigore_at_orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:

> Dear Experts,
>
> I am working on a CS3560 and I stumbled upon a strange error. Here you are
> the
> details:
>
> Rack1SW2#sh ver | i flas
> System image file is "flash:c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE4.bin"
> 512K bytes of flash-simulated non-volatile configuration memory.
> This is a sh run of the configuration, the issue that I have is with the
> NACL
> in the class-maps. I typed the correct name, but this is what I get when
> doing
> a sh run:
>
> ip access-list extended ICMP
> permit icmp any any
> ip access-list extended TELNET
> permit tcp any any eq telnet
> permit tcp any eq telnet any
>
> class-map match-all TELNET
> match access-group name 825504051 <<<
> class-map match-all ICMP
> match access-group name 825373488 <<<
> class-map match-all IPX
> match access-group name 825373488 <<<
> !
> !
> policy-map QOS
> class IPX
> set dscp ef
> class ICMP
> set dscp cs3
> class TELNET
> set precedence 2
> class class-default
> trust cos
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/6
> service-policy input QOS
>
> SOme more output:
>
> Rack1SW2#sh policy-map int fa0/6
> FastEthernet0/6
>
> Service-policy input: QOS
>
> Class-map: IPX (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: access-group name 1230002176 <<<
>
> Class-map: ICMP (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: access-group name 1230002176 <<<
>
> Class-map: TELNET (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: access-group name 1413827662 <<<
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: any
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
>
> I have removed the configuration, reloaded the device and re-entered the
> lines,
> still the same... Anyone have seen this? Any clues why the NACL names are
> displayed like that?
>
> Thanx in advance.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Pavel Bykov
----------------
Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net