RE: OEQ

From: Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:51:11 -0400

Dude, with the proctors reading this list I doubt you'll fail based on the
OEQ's: if they aren't as amazed as I am, I'll be surprised.

Seriously, if anyone out there could remember that stuff and the proctor's
failed them (or asked something like that as a question) it would be a
travesty against reason. I know it's hard for you as a native German speaker
to be tested in English, but your knowledge is exceptional and you taught me
a few new things last week.

Focus on your rack time, mate, and polish any area where you are weak(est).
Your lab should be a walk in the park if you can just maintain your
attention to detail for the 8 hours.

Chat to you soon, I'm sure.

Cheers,
 
Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Rene
Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 5:33 PM
To: Santiago Enciso
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: OEQ

But I honestly hope the OEQ are not that complicatet / deep in detail

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Rene <rene.klose_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> aren't dlci 0 for ANSI and ITU ?
>
> sure i don't rally get the 2 question do you mean how many dlci updates
can
> be transported in a singel LMI message ?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Santiago Enciso <
> senciso_at_infocenter.com.py> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 1) What sort of information is suponed to be carried in DLCI 0 of
>> frame relay?
>>
>> 2) How many DLCIs que be informed in a single LMI message in a
>> cisco physical frame-relay interface?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Santiago E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Written by me, not breaking any NDA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De:* Rene [mailto:rene.klose_at_gmail.com]
>> *Enviado el:* Miircoles, 13 de Mayo de 2009 16:53
>> *Para:* Santiago Enciso
>> *CC:* Cisco certification
>> *Asunto:* Re: OEQ
>>
>>
>>
>> 2) addresses between 0x0180C2000000 to 0x0180C200000F
>> (17 Multicast addresses of STP to be used by different bridge protocols)
>> 1)
>>
>> Bit 2 is the protcol identifier and 3 is BPDU Type,
>>
>> http://www.protocols.com/pbook/bridge.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Santiago Enciso <
>> senciso_at_infocenter.com.py> wrote:
>>
>> 1) What does bit position 2 and 3 mean in a Spanning-Tree BPDU?
>> 2) What is the multicast mac address used as destination address in
>> traditional spannig tree bpdus?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Santiago E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Written by me, not breaking any NDA
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Yogi Berra <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/y/yogi_berra.html>
-
"If you ask me anything I don't know, I'm not going to answer."
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from San Josi, Kalifornien, USA
> Vince
Lombardi<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/v/vince_lombardi.html> -
"We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time."

--
Sent from San Josi, Kalifornien, USA
Don Marquis <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/don_marquis.html>
- "Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday."
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 13 2009 - 17:51:11 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART