Re: any one looking for CCIE #

From: Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <tparamba_at_thecontactcentre.ae>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 07:32:10 +0400

Dale,

Well said.

Regards
Thameem

Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
11/05/2009 04:38 PM
Please respond to
Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>

To
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
cc

Subject
Re: any one looking for CCIE #

Hi,

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Danshtr <danshtr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.ccieflyer.com/2009-Mar-Monica-Cojocneanu.php

Sorry, I had to stop once I noticed that neither the interviewer or
the interviewee knew the difference between "loose" and "lose".

I can only hope it was a transcribed phone interview.

Back on topic, I view people with such fraudulent CCIE # associations
as dishonest and greedy. It doesn't reflect well on your character at
all. The rules are plain as day -- the partner requirements are there
so ensure partner organisations can deliver a specified level of
service. If that organisation has attained Silver or Gold status
through fraudulent CCIE # associations, how well do you think they'll
be doing in the marketplace? How successful will their projects be?

How will it look when the a legitimate recruiter or prospective
employer discovers you're associated with a shady partner
organisation? What message does it send?

My advice to you all is to carefully weigh up your options before
getting blinded by the dollar signs. Discussing it on a public forum
is pretty stupid, too, I might add.

cheers,
Dale

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue May 12 2009 - 07:32:10 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART