Re: any one looking for CCIE #

From: Anthony Faria <tfaria72_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:05:27 -0700

Just curious so you couldnt work part time and have your number associated?
Working part time not just them using your number. Saying you worked at a
place that didnt require your number. I am not trying to be stupid just
curious. I work at two places currently. One full time the other 20 hours a
week.

Tony

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Darby,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > <blah blah blah blah blah>
> > Maybe that's why Cisco limited the practice to like 50% of the required
> > umber of certified individuals on staff.
>
> If "the practice" you're referring to is a partner engaging
> contractors that fulfil one or more of the partner specialisation
> requirements, there are still rules. Most notably:
>
> "CCIE must have exclusive, full-time contract with partner in
> country seeking certification."
>
> Exclusive. Full-time.
>
> Don't piss-fart around with dictionary definitions.
>
> So, aside from the exception case:
>
> > Hey it might well be there full-time income.
>
> Anyone who sits on a partner's books, on anything other than a
> full-time, exclusive engagement, for the sole purpose of associating
> their #, is breaking the rules.
>
> And to anyone out there that sits at home working on their Tetris high
> score, living off the $15,000 p.a. CCIE # association retainer, good
> on you.
>
> Has anyone raised a case with Certifications Support on this? I guess
> that's the only way to know for sure. I certainly wouldn't risk a life
> ban without getting something in writing from Cisco.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 20:05:27 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART