Same thing happening with me , I joined new company and they are system
integrators where they prefer not only Cisco but also
Juniper,Foundary,Checkpoint as per the requirement of RFP.
Recently I am completing the setup of ISP which includes MALC(DSLAM) from
Zhone ,billing system for Apelo and Core Switches from foundary not
Cisco,Firewall from checkpoint .
I think now a days we should be product independent as competitors are
growing in the Market ; )
Thanks
Shahid Ansari
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Scott M Vermillion <
scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com> wrote:
> My personal hope is that if Cisco wants to certify people as experts in
> high-end platforms, they do it as some type of specialization. Every now
> and then I'm fortunate enough to work in an all-Cisco shop, but that's
> increasingly rare. What I love about the CCIE cert is that it's technology
> oriented vs. product oriented and most people in the industry (at least the
> technical ones) are aware of that. I'm working with a new client right now
> where the main internal network architect is a former SE from a major Cisco
> competitor. I don't think I appear to him as Cisco-biased just because I
> hold the CCIE certification. Were the focus of the cert to shift from OSPF,
> BGP, etc to 6509s and Nexus platforms, I think people would legitimately be
> able to point at a CCIE and say "you're only recommending that expensive
> Cisco platform because it's what you're certified in." That would be a bad
> day for the program indeed...
>
>
>
> On May 5, 2009, at 11:37 , Travis Niedens wrote:
>
> I've mentioned a few times on here that the CCIE R/S lab environment does
>> not necessarily reflect the hardware profile that many companies have
>> deployed; much of the 65xx chassis / line cards come with their own
>> caveats
>> and new features as you mention (VSS, MEC, etc.). Additionally, Cisco is
>> pushing for a migration to Nexus switches for the Data Center and that
>> runs
>> a completely different codebase. Even though this all is discussed in
>> jest,
>> I seriously wonder how long it will be before a CCIE level test is created
>> using 65xx / Nexus platforms. Perhaps with the Data Center 3.0 idea they
>> also should consider a CCIE DC Track (heck, there's more $$$ in that than
>> wireless).
>>
>> Travis
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Brad
>> Ellis
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:28 PM
>> To: Scott Morris; Tyson Scott
>> Cc: Scott M Vermillion; Cisco certification
>> Subject: RE: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E" Series
>> 3560?
>>
>> I think if it was a sales thing, they'd add some Cat6500-VSS 1440s or
>> Nexus7000s to the lab exam. (No, don't even say CSR-1!) Oh man, I hope
>> I didn't give "them" any ideas! That would be a pretty smart move by
>> Cisco. I could see the year-end earnings go through the roof. Stock
>> price would follow! :)
>>
>> thanks,
>> Brad Ellis
>> CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
>> CCSI# 30482
>> CEO / President
>> CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Learning Partner (CLP)
>> Email: brad_at_ccbootcamp.com
>> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
>> Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
>> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
>> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Scott Morris
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:15 PM
>> To: Tyson Scott
>> Cc: 'Scott M Vermillion'; 'Cisco certification'
>> Subject: Re: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E"
>> Series 3560?
>>
>> I agree. Unless it's a sales thing. We're coming up on quarter-end,
>> aren't we? Or year-end? :)
>>
>> It'll make some sales reps really happy if we all rush out to buy
>> 3560E's. But I hardly think it's necessary!
>>
>> Even Brian McGahan can't type at gigabit speed! :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>>
>> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>>
>> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>
>> smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com
>>
>>
>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>
>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>>
>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>>
>> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>>
>>
>> Knowledge is power.
>>
>> Power corrupts.
>>
>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tyson Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Scott,
>>>
>>> I am not sure if it is inside information that they will be using the
>>>
>> 3560 E
>>
>>> Series but I find it surprising if that is the case. They are going
>>>
>> with
>>
>>> 1841's which are about as cheap as it gets. I find it unlikely they
>>>
>> would
>>
>>> then use 3560-E's with the 1841's. On Cisco's post it says
>>>
>>> Catalyst 3560 Series switches running IOS version 12.2 - Advanced IP
>>> Services
>>>
>>> https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/docs/DOC-4602
>>>
>>> I assume that they also mean IP Services as Advanced IP Services has
>>>
>> been
>>
>>> phased out and the options are now IP Services and IP Base.
>>>
>>> I find it more likely they would connect the 3825's to the 3560 with
>>>
>> SFP
>>
>>> GBICs, (Either Fiber or Copper) on the 3560 then waste a 3560-E with
>>>
>> 24 GB
>>
>>> Ethernet ports. But who knows sometimes.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security
>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>>
>> Of
>>
>>> Scott M Vermillion
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:53 AM
>>> To: Cisco certification
>>> Subject: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E" Series
>>>
>> 3560?
>>
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> So we know they're moving to the ISRs (about time!) on the router side
>>>
>>
>> of the house. In looking at the blueprint, can anyone see what might
>>>
>>
>> be driving them to the "E" flavor of the 3560? In the real world,
>>> 10GigE is often the driving factor for ponying up the extra $$$, at
>>> least in my experience. Not sure what value that would hold here?
>>> Just curious more than anything...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 07 2009 - 10:07:28 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART