Re: Cisco Announced change to R&S

From: Scott M Vermillion <scott_ccie_list_at_it-ag.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:37:39 -0600

Hey Ryan,

You bring up a very good point, actually. You were part of a thread
the other day regarding late-phase preparation tactics. I was tempted
to offer you one piece of advice but didn't for whatever reason. I'll
offer it now, in light of this latest firestorm:

I completely shut out GS and all other distractions starting about 30
days out from my lab date. I had a very limited circle of people I
maintained any kind of contact with whatsoever. None of this traffic
is helpful to those of you marching in to do battle soon, even if it's
"interesting" to the community as a whole. The list membership
requirement to either be a CCIE or have a firm lab date scheduled is
apparently no longer enforced, and to the detriment of the list and
especially to its members who are still serious candidates, IMHO.
Thus, it's up to you yourself to manage what gets processed through
your mental inbox. Use the force Luke...

Regards,

Scott

On May 5, 2009, at 6:50 , Ryan West wrote:

> Seriously, can we get back to topics that matter for candidates _who
> are scheduled to take exam_ or current CCIEs. When I signed up for
> this list, I thought that's what it was... Please remove the send
> button from your mail client.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Dark Fiber
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:40 AM
> To: Darby Weaver
> Cc: smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com; Nauman Habib; Cisco
> certification; ron wilkerson
> Subject: Re: Cisco Announced change to R&S
>
> I don't get it, who cares???????
>
> You are assuming that this most/whole mailing list cheats...
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darby Weaver" <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> To: "ron wilkerson" <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com, "Nauman Habib"
> <mrnauman_at_gmail.com>, "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 8:36:42 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: Cisco Announced change to R&S
>
> Something they left out:
>
> Candidates will be presented
> with a series of trouble tickets for preconfigured networks, and
> they will
> need to diagnose and resolve the network fault or faults a realistic
> and
> challenging job task. Candidates who finish the troubleshooting
> section
> early can move on to the configuration section, but they will not be
> allowed
> to go back to the troubleshooting section, since their equipment
> will need
> to be reinitialized for the configuration portion of the exam.
>
>
> Read this carefully.... Very carefully.
>
>
> Now imagine you get to your lab...
>
> 1. You manage to survice the OEQ.
>
> 2. You get to the troubleshooting section (of a network you did not
> configure in the first place - just like work)...
>
> 3. You don't make the score....
>
> 4. You now are told sorry and shown the door and reminded not to
> miss you
> flight back home.
>
>
> Sorry guys - the truth hurts.
>
>
> If you do not pass the pre-lab.... you will not set eyes on the new
> labs...
>
>
> Cheating has been effectively nullified (at least for now).
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue May 05 2009 - 09:37:39 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:41 ART