Yep, I have a few of these. You are right ... these are supported and work
fine. Good point. I like the integrated DSU cards a little better, mostly
due to the smaller cable runs between devices. Also, these are easy to run
to a 8 port IMA card on a 72 or 3600.
My lab is mostly put together. I am always on the lookout and add to it
when I can, and I learn a lot from this mailer. As the same with many of
you rock stars, my office sounds like an airport. ;-)
Andrew
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:
> Youre not using WIC-1T=? Those are really cheap on ebay, between 10 and
> 15 bux. Are you still putting your lab together?
>
>
>
> *From:* ALL From_NJ [mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 04, 2009 10:43 PM
> *To:* Evan Weston
> *Cc:* Ryan West; Cisco certification; David Clark
> *Subject:* Re: 1841 - good for labs?
>
>
>
> Many thanks thus far. Appreciate all the feedback and back and forth ...
> good stuff team.
>
> I noticed that about the voice ... I figured I needed a diff image, but
> have not looked. The router would not recognize my vic2-4fxo card ... not
> good. I wish it would have recognized the wic-1dsu-t1 cards ... these are
> nice. Oh well ...
>
> Any additional thoughts?
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Evan Weston <evan_weston_at_hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm using a couple of these for R&S and haven't come across anything they
> can't do.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ryan
> West
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2009 12:24 PM
> To: ALL From_NJ; Cisco certification; David Clark
> Subject: RE: 1841 - good for labs?
>
> This is completely non-scientific, but the image is 24954.40 KB. I have 5
> 2801's in my rack and I remember listing to a VoD that said to steer away
> from these as they were quite limited. You might need to check out
> www.cisco.com/go/fn to see what the differences are. For me, my 2801's
> will
> never become a SP lab, they have little to no MPLS support on them. I'd
> give the 1841's a definite maybe :)
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> ALL
> From_NJ
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:14 PM
> To: Cisco certification; David Clark
> Subject: 1841 - good for labs?
>
> Hey team,
>
> I hope this finds you all doing well.
>
> I have just gotten a 1841 router and wondered your thoughts on using this
> in
> my R&S labs. It is small and quiet ... me likey this ... a nice contrast
> from my other routers. I am mostly doing ccbootcamp labs. It seems that
> this router pretty much supports everything ... any thoughts on
> limitations? Anyone else using one of these?
>
> Please share ... I do not want to put this in my lab / in the mix without
> some feedback. Many thanks and kindest regards,
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
-- Andrew Lee Lissitz all.from.nj_at_gmail.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon May 04 2009 - 22:53:09 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:41 ART