Re: WRED default values?

From: Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <tparamba_at_thecontactcentre.ae>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:31:24 +0400

random-detect precedence-based..

IOS already have RED profiles for precedence and dscp.

Warm regards
Thameem

qospf qospf <cisco.qospf_at_gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
30/04/2009 11:08 AM
Please respond to
qospf qospf <cisco.qospf_at_gmail.com>

To
Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
cc

Subject
WRED default values?

HI,

I'm doing a lab on WRED.

The question asks to configure 3 class maps "Priority" (35%), "Bulk"(25%)
and "Best-effort" (20%) with precedence assigned, 4, (2 and 3), and (0 and
1). THe WRED drop probability it says is "AS PER DEFAULT FOR THE
PRECEDENCE
VALUE/S"

(being configured on an FE interface)

I'm a bit confused with how the solution determines the default precedence
value. For example, the solution says:

for class Best-effort:
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect precedence 0 *20 40* 10
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect precedence 1 *22 40* 10

for class Bulk:

R1(config-pmap-c)#class Bulk
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect precedence 2 *24 40* 10
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect precedence 3 *24 40* 10

for class Priority:

R1(config-pmap-c)#class PRIORITY
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect
R1(config-pmap-c)#random-detect precedence 4 *28 40* 10

I can't figure out how the bolded values were determined for this
solution.
Any link that explains this would be appreciated....I couldn't really find
a
good explanation in the doc cd for this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/config_wred_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1006740

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/congestion_avoidance_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html

thanks

-- 
--------
check out my blog! http://qospf.wordpress.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 30 2009 - 12:31:24 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:13 ART