I have used the Parent/Child policy structure on Ethernet sub-interfaces and
limited each sub-interface to a specific amount of bandwidth and it worked for
me.
HTH,
Lloyd
From: Evan Weston
Sent: Wed 4/29/2009 8:38 AM
To: aly.groupstudy_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: qos under subinterface
I believe that if you add an MQC policy that shapes in class-default and
calls a child MQC you can do what you need.
Its here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/qos_mqc_ps6350_T
SD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1060235
Under the section " Traffic Policy as a QoS Policy (Hierarchical Traffic
Policies): Example" it talks about doing this with subinterfaces.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
aly.groupstudy_at_gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 10:50 PM
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: qos under subinterface
Normally qos config under sub nterface are limited (ex. cannot do priority
queuing
does it really work if we we used the work around and apply it using a
nested
policy ?
Can anyone confirm if router will truly apply the qos mechanism and not just
accept it with CLI
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Apr 29 2009 - 12:48:47 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:13 ART