Re: Simple Doubt regarding BGP

From: nAyYAR <nyrhh_at_hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:11:48 +0100

Hi Raghav,

I believe the behavior is related to BGP auto-summary ... have a look at
this link it might help.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a00800949e8.shtml#five

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Raghav Bhargava" <raghavbhargava12_at_gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:55 AM
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Simple Doubt regarding BGP

> Hi Experts,
>
> Very basic question
>
> Suppose I have this ip address configured on my loopback Interface of R1
>
> 2.2.2.2/8
>
> Now under my BGP Process if i advertise this network as
>
>
> network 2.2.2.2
>
> OR
>
> network 2.0.0.0
>
> Now in first case I don't see this network in the BGP table of the other
> router but
> if I follow the second case the network is seen.
>
> Can anyone please explain why is it doing like this??
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> Raghav
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 28 2009 - 03:11:48 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:13 ART